Desolation of Smaug predictions

For discussion of the upcoming films based on The Hobbit and related material, as well as previous films based on Tolkien's work
Post Reply
User avatar
Voronwë the Faithful
At the intersection of here and now
Posts: 46206
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 1:41 am
Contact:

Post by Voronwë the Faithful »

yov, you are missing the point. It is not comparing the RT score to the average, it is comparing the average rating to other films to see if it corresponds to what they are getting for an RT score. And it doesn't; not even close. The difference isn't just significant; it is huge. Films with borderline scores that are going in as fresh for other films are uniformly being listed as rotten for DoS. That is not an opinion. That is fact, supported by clear evidence.
"Spirits in the shape of hawks and eagles flew ever to and from his halls; and their eyes could see to the depths of the seas, and pierce the hidden caverns beneath the world."
User avatar
Voronwë the Faithful
At the intersection of here and now
Posts: 46206
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 1:41 am
Contact:

Post by Voronwë the Faithful »

Back to 76%, with 3 new very positive reviews from the Daily Express, This Is London, and Sky News.
"Spirits in the shape of hawks and eagles flew ever to and from his halls; and their eyes could see to the depths of the seas, and pierce the hidden caverns beneath the world."
User avatar
Voronwë the Faithful
At the intersection of here and now
Posts: 46206
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 1:41 am
Contact:

Post by Voronwë the Faithful »

Four more, three fresh (including one top critic) and one rotten.
"Spirits in the shape of hawks and eagles flew ever to and from his halls; and their eyes could see to the depths of the seas, and pierce the hidden caverns beneath the world."
User avatar
yovargas
I miss Prim ...
Posts: 15011
Joined: Thu Dec 08, 2005 12:13 am
Location: Florida

Post by yovargas »

Voronwë the Faithful wrote:And perhaps most telling:

The Conjuring, 87%, 7.2
What it's telling is that those who liked Conjuring did so with fewer reservations. It means that relative to DoS, it had more "loves" instead of "likes". A current review of DoS on metacritic shows just that (though with only 13 scores) - plenty of likes, not much loves.
I wanna love somebody but I don't know how
I wanna throw my body in the river and drown
-The Decemberists


Image
User avatar
Voronwë the Faithful
At the intersection of here and now
Posts: 46206
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 1:41 am
Contact:

Post by Voronwë the Faithful »

yovargas wrote:
Voronwë the Faithful wrote:And perhaps most telling:

The Conjuring, 87%, 7.2
What it's telling is that those who liked Conjuring did so with fewer reservations.
No, it is just the opposite! Those who liked the Conjuring did so with more reservations, hence the lower average score, relative to the number of fresh/rotten. But many more of the borderline scores were judged to be fresh for The Conjuring than for The Hobbit. That is what is troublesome.
Last edited by Voronwë the Faithful on Wed Dec 11, 2013 9:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"Spirits in the shape of hawks and eagles flew ever to and from his halls; and their eyes could see to the depths of the seas, and pierce the hidden caverns beneath the world."
User avatar
yovargas
I miss Prim ...
Posts: 15011
Joined: Thu Dec 08, 2005 12:13 am
Location: Florida

Post by yovargas »

Oops, yes, I was thinking backwards. :oops:
I wanna love somebody but I don't know how
I wanna throw my body in the river and drown
-The Decemberists


Image
User avatar
Voronwë the Faithful
At the intersection of here and now
Posts: 46206
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 1:41 am
Contact:

Post by Voronwë the Faithful »

:)
"Spirits in the shape of hawks and eagles flew ever to and from his halls; and their eyes could see to the depths of the seas, and pierce the hidden caverns beneath the world."
User avatar
Dave_LF
Wrong within normal parameters
Posts: 6813
Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2006 10:59 am
Location: The other side of Michigan

Post by Dave_LF »

That's why I'm thinking someone somewhere must be doing this:

"What do you give it on a scale of 1 to 10?"
"Well; there were cool visuals and it was kind of fun. Let's say 6. Maybe 7"

"Does it get your official thumbs up?"
"Hm. Well, it's a movie about dwarves and elves for crying out loud. And it wasn't as good as last decade. So no, I can't say that."
User avatar
Voronwë the Faithful
At the intersection of here and now
Posts: 46206
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 1:41 am
Contact:

Post by Voronwë the Faithful »

USA Today review dropped it back to 75%, after a bunch of fresh reviews briefly brought it back up to 76%.

Negative review in the USA Today (idiotic though it is), bodes poorly for box office, since it is a national paper with a high readership.
"Spirits in the shape of hawks and eagles flew ever to and from his halls; and their eyes could see to the depths of the seas, and pierce the hidden caverns beneath the world."
User avatar
Voronwë the Faithful
At the intersection of here and now
Posts: 46206
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 1:41 am
Contact:

Post by Voronwë the Faithful »

Second predictions (similar to second breakfast, except completely different):

Tomatometer (as of December 16th): 72%

North American Opening Weekend: $61 mil

Total North American Gross: $280 mil

World Wide Gross: $0.95 bil
"Spirits in the shape of hawks and eagles flew ever to and from his halls; and their eyes could see to the depths of the seas, and pierce the hidden caverns beneath the world."
User avatar
Voronwë the Faithful
At the intersection of here and now
Posts: 46206
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 1:41 am
Contact:

Post by Voronwë the Faithful »

It now has a higher MetaCritic score (up to 74) than an RT score (down to 73). That is unheard of.
"Spirits in the shape of hawks and eagles flew ever to and from his halls; and their eyes could see to the depths of the seas, and pierce the hidden caverns beneath the world."
Passdagas the Brown
Posts: 3154
Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2013 9:31 pm

Post by Passdagas the Brown »

One thing that really pains me is that an inferior writer of an inferior set of books, GRR Martin, is having his work adapted in an astronomically superior way to Tolkien's. IMO.

In my former workplace, I constantly heard people praise the attributes of Martin's work over Tolkien's, largely in reference to the difference in quality between the Game of Thrones TV series and the first Hobbit film.

The beauty and wonder of Tolkien's books deserved a far more compelling treatment. Jackson doesn't have a lyrical bone in his body, and Tolkien's legacy has suffered as a result.
User avatar
yovargas
I miss Prim ...
Posts: 15011
Joined: Thu Dec 08, 2005 12:13 am
Location: Florida

Post by yovargas »

Voronwë the Faithful wrote:It now has a higher MetaCritic score (up to 74) than an RT score (down to 73). That is unheard of.
Wow, yeah, I can't recall ever seeing that before.
Jackson doesn't have a lyrical bone in his body...
Passdagas the Brown wrote:But what leavens this frustration for me is that there are some scenes "shot through" PJ's canvas, which are wonderful and sometimes sublime. The FOTR prologue, the early scenes of Gandalf's cart shambling through the Shire, the reveal of Dwarrowdelf, Boromir's death, Frodo and Sam looking out over the Emyn Muil, Gandalf and the Balrog's plunge into the depths of Moria with that exquisite long shot of the deep lake, the Rohirrim on the plain, Éomer's confrontation with the three hunters, the glorious image of Meduseld, Theodred's funeral (my absolute favorite), Théoden lamenting at Theodred's grave as the sun begins to set, Gollum's end-of-TTT monologue, the lighting of the beacons (perfect), Gandalf riding out onto the Pelennor to drive away the Nazgûl with a shaft of white light (my single favorite shot across all three films), the eerily august glow as the forces of Mordor make their way into the outer rings of Minas Tirith killing as they go, the elemental beauty of Frodo and Sam on the slopes of Mt. Doom as a rain of fire descends in the background, the look on the faces of the fellowship as they realize Sauron has fallen, but also that Frodo and Sam have likely been sacrificed, the sublime flight of the eagles, the perfect "good morning" scene, Thranduil on a massive elk (love that touch), Bilbo's hilarious overly-polite attempts at managing the dwarves, the Battle of Azanulbizar (possibly my favorite "battle" across all four films), and again, the eagle rescue, with that gorgeous long shot of them flying over the hills, and finally, that wonderful lingering shot of the thrush flying toward the mountain, and then tapping snails against the rock.

These are all great moments, and some of them are my favorite moments in cinema. So I am grateful for that.
I wanna love somebody but I don't know how
I wanna throw my body in the river and drown
-The Decemberists


Image
User avatar
sauronsfinger
Posts: 3508
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2005 2:25 am

Post by sauronsfinger »

Voronwë the Faithful wrote:USA Today review dropped it back to 75%, after a bunch of fresh reviews briefly brought it back up to 76%.

Negative review in the USA Today (idiotic though it is), bodes poorly for box office, since it is a national paper with a high readership.
There are films which are bad review proof so to speak. Given the audience that is already established for Middle-earth/Jackson films, I suspect we would have to see almost all really bad reviews on a consistent basis across the world for it to really have any measurable box office effect.
There are two novels that can change a bookish fourteen-year old's life: The Lord of the Rings and Atlas Shrugged. One is a childish fantasy that often engenders a lifelong obsession with its unbelievable heroes, leading to an emotionally stunted, socially crippled adulthood, unable to deal with the real world. The other, of course, involves orcs.... John Rogers
User avatar
Voronwë the Faithful
At the intersection of here and now
Posts: 46206
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 1:41 am
Contact:

Post by Voronwë the Faithful »

Down to 72%. Still missing the very positive LA Times and Entertainment Weekly reviews, however.

But Metacritic down to 69 with the ridiculous NY Post review added as the first negative one included there.
"Spirits in the shape of hawks and eagles flew ever to and from his halls; and their eyes could see to the depths of the seas, and pierce the hidden caverns beneath the world."
User avatar
Smaug's voice
Nibonto Aagun
Posts: 1085
Joined: Wed Nov 20, 2013 9:21 am

Post by Smaug's voice »

Sadly, with the flurry of negative reviews on RT, I don't think now DOS will end up much better than AUJ there. 70-71 at the most, though I am expecting somewhere about 68%.
User avatar
Voronwë the Faithful
At the intersection of here and now
Posts: 46206
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 1:41 am
Contact:

Post by Voronwë the Faithful »

Well, it made it back up to 74%, and currently is at 73%, with at least three major positive reviews (LA Times, Entertainment Weekly, and Richard Roeper) still missing. I'm going to stick with my "second prediction" of 72%.
"Spirits in the shape of hawks and eagles flew ever to and from his halls; and their eyes could see to the depths of the seas, and pierce the hidden caverns beneath the world."
Passdagas the Brown
Posts: 3154
Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2013 9:31 pm

Post by Passdagas the Brown »

yovargas wrote:
Voronwë the Faithful wrote:It now has a higher MetaCritic score (up to 74) than an RT score (down to 73). That is unheard of.
Wow, yeah, I can't recall ever seeing that before.
Jackson doesn't have a lyrical bone in his body...
Passdagas the Brown wrote:But what leavens this frustration for me is that there are some scenes "shot through" PJ's canvas, which are wonderful and sometimes sublime. The FOTR prologue, the early scenes of Gandalf's cart shambling through the Shire, the reveal of Dwarrowdelf, Boromir's death, Frodo and Sam looking out over the Emyn Muil, Gandalf and the Balrog's plunge into the depths of Moria with that exquisite long shot of the deep lake, the Rohirrim on the plain, Éomer's confrontation with the three hunters, the glorious image of Meduseld, Theodred's funeral (my absolute favorite), Théoden lamenting at Theodred's grave as the sun begins to set, Gollum's end-of-TTT monologue, the lighting of the beacons (perfect), Gandalf riding out onto the Pelennor to drive away the Nazgûl with a shaft of white light (my single favorite shot across all three films), the eerily august glow as the forces of Mordor make their way into the outer rings of Minas Tirith killing as they go, the elemental beauty of Frodo and Sam on the slopes of Mt. Doom as a rain of fire descends in the background, the look on the faces of the fellowship as they realize Sauron has fallen, but also that Frodo and Sam have likely been sacrificed, the sublime flight of the eagles, the perfect "good morning" scene, Thranduil on a massive elk (love that touch), Bilbo's hilarious overly-polite attempts at managing the dwarves, the Battle of Azanulbizar (possibly my favorite "battle" across all four films), and again, the eagle rescue, with that gorgeous long shot of them flying over the hills, and finally, that wonderful lingering shot of the thrush flying toward the mountain, and then tapping snails against the rock.

These are all great moments, and some of them are my favorite moments in cinema. So I am grateful for that.
How dare you trap me in a contradiction using my own words???? ;)
User avatar
Voronwë the Faithful
At the intersection of here and now
Posts: 46206
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 1:41 am
Contact:

Post by Voronwë the Faithful »

Then again, right back down to 71% with two new negative reviews.
"Spirits in the shape of hawks and eagles flew ever to and from his halls; and their eyes could see to the depths of the seas, and pierce the hidden caverns beneath the world."
User avatar
yovargas
I miss Prim ...
Posts: 15011
Joined: Thu Dec 08, 2005 12:13 am
Location: Florida

Post by yovargas »

Just talking you off that ledger by sharing the opinion of someone I know you respect. ;)
I wanna love somebody but I don't know how
I wanna throw my body in the river and drown
-The Decemberists


Image
Post Reply