![three faces :3face:](./images/smilies/008.gif)
![Razz :P](./images/smilies/77tongue.gif)
Speaking of adaptations, I caught the second half of Stardust, which I've seen before. Talk about changing the story! And Gaiman apparently was involved with the making of the movie, so I guess he must have been ok with it.
In honesty? Nothing was wrong with it, but it just didn't really do much for me. The effects were fab, the story was good, the acting was good... it just didn't fire on all cylinders for some reason. I'd put it on a par with the Thor movies.Smaug's voice wrote:Alatar - what was wrong with the Spidey film? I haven't seenit but hopeful for it (since Garfield is such a brilliant Parker). And I know which key moment you speak of.
was it better than the first movie, the one released in 2012? I am not too keen on Thor though.Alatar wrote:In honesty? Nothing was wrong with it, but it just didn't reallySmaug's voice wrote:Alatar - what was wrong with the Spidey film? I haven't seenit
but hopeful for it (since Garfield is such a brilliant Parker). And I
know which key moment you speak of.
do much for me. The effects were fab, the story was good, the acting
was good... it just didn't fire on all cylinders for some reason. I'd
put it on a par with the Thor movies.