hi, themary!
I'm sorry to say that I didn't care for the movie of "Children of Men" at all. That shocked me because I had heard so many good things about the movie and had enjoyed the book so much.
I suspect I would have liked it much better if I hadn't read the book. My big problem was that they changed so very much. It was as if the screenwriter had read the blurb on the back cover and created his own story based only on that. So the basic situation was the same (no children, society in chaos, humanity's end in sight), but the characters and plot were entirely different. BookJulian, who was the young woman who miraculously became pregnant and was on the run with her husband, a priest, a midwife, and the hero (a historian!), became MovieJulian, who was the hero's ex-wife and underground rebel fighter. A different woman was pregnant. And I can't even begin to describe the differences in the plot. It wasn't a matter of condensing the novel, but of totally re-imagining it, using some of the same names.
That might have been fine except that I really
liked the book. There were more elements that made me think, more explorations of the role of religion, more examination of the depression that smothered a society without hope. The characters were more thoughtful. I suppose those are things that are hard to translate to the screen, but I didn't think they'd be thrown out entirely.
Besides, knowing that there was a good movie of the book, I kept seeing its scenes in my mind as I read, translating them to film. I was really looking forward to some of them. All gone.
I'm glad you liked it, though.
I suspect that people who liked the movie and then decided to read the book were as put off as I was. Which is interesting, since the copy I bought had a picture from the movie on the cover.