Primula Baggins wrote:
There's currently a wave of excellent SF and fantasy written by people of color and people not from northern Europe/North America that includes the writer's own culture of origin or one they know very well, extrapolated into the future or blended with magic. It's wonderful, and it's winning attention and awards in a field where that was a very tough sell only a decade or two ago. So some people from northern Europe/NA are tempted to try to write that way themselves, with characters from real cultures that the writers aren't intimately familiar with—just borrow some names and read a few legends and crank out a story. (a) This is hard to pull off well, and (b) whether or not their intentions are good, it can look like culturally empowered writers, who have historically had an advantage in the SFF market, trying to steal bandwidth from writers who are not.
Yes, this is a different kind of thing for sure. I don't think any writer should be afraid of writing a Dominican character into their story because they are not Dominican or familiar with Dominicans. But if that writer was writing stories set in the Dominican Republic, about Dominican people, well, I I wouldn't necessarily find that offensive but I really doubt they could write a story I would think is any good. And if that writer started getting praise for their story about Dominican peoples that he clearly doesn't know or understand, then yeah, I might start getting pissed about that.
To me, it's a fairly simple distinction. You are the writer can create individuals regardless of race or whatever. But if you're going to try and write about a existing culture, not a imaginary culture you created, you should really try damn hard to make sure you know what you are talking about. I would definitely not tell someone they shouldn't do it, just that they should really do their homework. If they're not willing to do that, it's probably best to leave it alone.