Hobbit Video Diary links and discussion
Yep. The LotR movies are really long partly because of the length and complexity of the story, but also because PJ likes to have a lot of both quiet character moments and big flashy (often good, but sometimes stupid) action scenes. I haven't seen Donkey Kong, but I've heard it's similar in that regard.
The Two Towers, for example, gets grief sometimes for all the action, and I'm not that big a fan of the warg battle myself (I don't mind him putting an action scene there and the Fellowship book had a warg battle anyway, but the execution is lacking and it just feels perfunctory). But there actually isn't that much action up until that point after the Gandalf fight, then another fairly long break between the wargs and Helms Deep. And plenty of quiet character moments even in the theatrical cut.
At the end of the day, PJ was the one excited enough about LotR to actively seek out directing it. Maybe someone like David Lean or 70s-quality FF Coppola would have made more consistent movies, but would they even have wanted to direct it? And if they had accepted the task, would they have been passionate enough about the material to seek out people like John Howe and Alan Lee? Who knows.
The Two Towers, for example, gets grief sometimes for all the action, and I'm not that big a fan of the warg battle myself (I don't mind him putting an action scene there and the Fellowship book had a warg battle anyway, but the execution is lacking and it just feels perfunctory). But there actually isn't that much action up until that point after the Gandalf fight, then another fairly long break between the wargs and Helms Deep. And plenty of quiet character moments even in the theatrical cut.
At the end of the day, PJ was the one excited enough about LotR to actively seek out directing it. Maybe someone like David Lean or 70s-quality FF Coppola would have made more consistent movies, but would they even have wanted to direct it? And if they had accepted the task, would they have been passionate enough about the material to seek out people like John Howe and Alan Lee? Who knows.
- Primula Baggins
- Living in hope
- Posts: 40005
- Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 1:43 am
- Location: Sailing the luminiferous aether
- Contact:
I think it's likely that some very fine directors would have felt nothing for the material, or even curled their lip a bit. Many people who've never read LotR know just one thing about it: they're far too hip to bother with it.
For all PJ's shortcomings (disclosure: they aren't enough to keep me from loving those films), we would have been much worse off with a more tasteful and conventionally gifted director who had no respect for the book or the people who care about it.
For all PJ's shortcomings (disclosure: they aren't enough to keep me from loving those films), we would have been much worse off with a more tasteful and conventionally gifted director who had no respect for the book or the people who care about it.
“There, peeping among the cloud-wrack above a dark tor high up in the mountains, Sam saw a white star twinkle for a while. The beauty of it smote his heart, as he looked up out of the forsaken land, and hope returned to him. For like a shaft, clear and cold, the thought pierced him that in the end the Shadow was only a small and passing thing: there was light and high beauty for ever beyond its reach.”
― J.R.R. Tolkien, The Return of the King
― J.R.R. Tolkien, The Return of the King
Indeed. See Boorman's treatment for an example of how badly wrong it could have gone!kzer_za wrote: At the end of the day, PJ was the one excited enough about LotR to actively seek out directing it. Maybe someone like David Lean or 70s-quality FF Coppola would have made more consistent movies, but would they even have wanted to direct it? And if they had accepted the task, would they have been passionate enough about the material to seek out people like John Howe and Alan Lee? Who knows.
The Vinyamars on Stage! This time at Bag End
One possible reason I'm in the minority in thinking TTT is the best of the 3. It spends the most time on its characters and nails most of those character moments.kzer_za wrote:The Two Towers, for example, gets grief sometimes for all the action, and I'm not that big a fan of the warg battle myself (I don't mind him putting an action scene there and the Fellowship book had a warg battle anyway, but the execution is lacking and it just feels perfunctory). But there actually isn't that much action up until that point after the Gandalf fight, then another fairly long break between the wargs and Helms Deep. And plenty of quiet character moments even in the theatrical cut.
-
- Posts: 3154
- Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2013 9:31 pm
Agreed. IMO, the first half of TTT is the best film in the series. It slowly goes downhill during Helm's Deep, but overall, I think it was the best of the three.yovargas wrote:One possible reason I'm in the minority in thinking TTT is the best of the 3. It spends the most time on its characters and nails most of those character moments.kzer_za wrote:The Two Towers, for example, gets grief sometimes for all the action, and I'm not that big a fan of the warg battle myself (I don't mind him putting an action scene there and the Fellowship book had a warg battle anyway, but the execution is lacking and it just feels perfunctory). But there actually isn't that much action up until that point after the Gandalf fight, then another fairly long break between the wargs and Helms Deep. And plenty of quiet character moments even in the theatrical cut.
- Voronwë the Faithful
- At the intersection of here and now
- Posts: 46575
- Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 1:41 am
- Contact:
Screen Caps from Production Video No. 11, from the one and only Dark Jackal:
http://thorinoakenshield.net/the-hobbit ... creencaps/
http://thorinoakenshield.net/the-hobbit ... creencaps/
"Spirits in the shape of hawks and eagles flew ever to and from his halls; and their eyes could see to the depths of the seas, and pierce the hidden caverns beneath the world."
-
- Posts: 3154
- Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2013 9:31 pm
Not so sure about that. An accomplished director, Alfonso Cuaron, who is very well-respected in the film world as an auteur, took it upon himself to direct one of the Harry Potter films (Prisoners) which most critics, and many fans, found to be the best of the series. He certainly didn't sneer at it, and his other films have a mythic elegance to them, and what seems to be a love of the genre.Primula Baggins wrote:I think it's likely that some very fine directors would have felt nothing for the material, or even curled their lip a bit. Many people who've never read LotR know just one thing about it: they're far too hip to bother with it.
For all PJ's shortcomings (disclosure: they aren't enough to keep me from loving those films), we would have been much worse off with a more tasteful and conventionally gifted director who had no respect for the book or the people who care about it.
Watching his various films (esp. Children of Men) and listening to his commentaries, I am led to believe that he understands film, as well as myth and fantasy, on a far deeper level than PJ.
And that's not necessarily an insult. PJ admits, while paraphrasing Alfred Hitchcock, that his films are slices of cake, not slices of life.
It is hard to think of a film-making philosophy less suited to the adaptation of Tolkien.
- Primula Baggins
- Living in hope
- Posts: 40005
- Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 1:43 am
- Location: Sailing the luminiferous aether
- Contact:
Well, I didn't say that all very fine directors would dismiss the material. Azkaban is my favorite of the HP series—in book and film, which is interesting. But it's certainly a risk that an accomplished director might not bend as far as accepting and engaging with material that has an element of the fantastic. That isn't at all the fashion now, after all.
I haven't read the "slices of cake" remark. But there are things in the LotR films that to me, at least, indicate that PJ is perfectly able to understand and respect Tolkien's LotR.
Just not consistently.
But . . . I still am not sure that we would have gotten the quality we (IMO) did, and the many (IMO) parts of the films that worked as Tolkien and as film, with many other directors living.
Peter Weir, maybe.
GdT, I am not at all sure. His esthetic trumps so much in some of his films, including plot and drama and comprehensibility. GdT's a genius and he knows it. Tolkien is dead. Would Tolkien stand a chance?
I think he stood more of a chance with PJ.
I haven't read the "slices of cake" remark. But there are things in the LotR films that to me, at least, indicate that PJ is perfectly able to understand and respect Tolkien's LotR.
Just not consistently.
But . . . I still am not sure that we would have gotten the quality we (IMO) did, and the many (IMO) parts of the films that worked as Tolkien and as film, with many other directors living.
Peter Weir, maybe.
GdT, I am not at all sure. His esthetic trumps so much in some of his films, including plot and drama and comprehensibility. GdT's a genius and he knows it. Tolkien is dead. Would Tolkien stand a chance?
I think he stood more of a chance with PJ.
“There, peeping among the cloud-wrack above a dark tor high up in the mountains, Sam saw a white star twinkle for a while. The beauty of it smote his heart, as he looked up out of the forsaken land, and hope returned to him. For like a shaft, clear and cold, the thought pierced him that in the end the Shadow was only a small and passing thing: there was light and high beauty for ever beyond its reach.”
― J.R.R. Tolkien, The Return of the King
― J.R.R. Tolkien, The Return of the King
- Voronwë the Faithful
- At the intersection of here and now
- Posts: 46575
- Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 1:41 am
- Contact:
Prim, well said (except that PoA is my least favorite Potter film, though that is a conversation for a different place and time).
"Spirits in the shape of hawks and eagles flew ever to and from his halls; and their eyes could see to the depths of the seas, and pierce the hidden caverns beneath the world."
- Dave_LF
- Wrong within normal parameters
- Posts: 6853
- Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2006 10:59 am
- Location: The other side of Michigan
I'm a pushover, I guess. I am certainly aware of many ways the films could have been better and have been known to gripe from time to time , but when it comes down to it I'm just so happy to have the films at all that I can't help but like them. According to my wife, I was grinning like an idiot through most of AUJ; even Goblintown.
I'm also not sure how fair it is to blame/credit Jackson personally for all of the creative decisions in such a massive, collaborative undertaking, especially since he seems to be the least involved of the 3 (4?) writers (though during LotR he was clearly able to override the other two's objections when he wanted to, judging from the commentaries).
I'm also not sure how fair it is to blame/credit Jackson personally for all of the creative decisions in such a massive, collaborative undertaking, especially since he seems to be the least involved of the 3 (4?) writers (though during LotR he was clearly able to override the other two's objections when he wanted to, judging from the commentaries).
Re: Goblin Town
Passdagas the Brown wrote: Agreed. Though I find this to be a problem in both AUJ and the LOTR trilogy. Through a combination of both set design, lighting and cinematography, the studio sets often look like studio sets! Location shooting (ahem, Rohan?) yields much more beautiful results.
I didnt find it to be much of a problem in the lotr trilogy. Though not all they could be, the different places in ME felt real and organic enough for me. Rivendell might be a little overlight with a golden atmosphere and two or three background paintings might not be as well accomplished as they possibly could, but nothing like AUJ's rivendell, which looks to me like an overlight studio set with digital backgrounds added afterwards.
Its interetsing to wonder what has happened to that brave, almost indie like unconformist, daring filmmaker, jackson , in my opinion, was, as far as location shootings.
Taking advantage of the organic and irreplaceable quality of nature and locations from NZ, was jacksons's motto for bringing Middle Earth to life in Lotr, wasnt it?
He seems to have lost that approach and learned to just settle with a lot more studio and green screen work. A very Lucasesque- if that's even a word- change.
For me, either of those three directors would be more interesting choices for MEarth, Alfonso, Weir or DelToro. I like many of their films, unlike jackson's own filmography and regard them as superior filmmakers.
Both Pan's Labyrinth and POA are great fantasy films, with more artistic merits and clear visions behind them than auj, imo.
Another interesting chocie could be Neil Jordan, who directed the gothic fairytale The Company of Wolves.
Ride a bike, eat a cupcake, smile.
Get outside and enjoy the fresh air. Let your body work for you as part of your everyday routine, not as “exercise.”
Then reward your body with a sugar high. You deserve it.
And ease up a little on yourself : perfection is an unworthy goal. Everything will balance itself out in the end.
Get outside and enjoy the fresh air. Let your body work for you as part of your everyday routine, not as “exercise.”
Then reward your body with a sugar high. You deserve it.
And ease up a little on yourself : perfection is an unworthy goal. Everything will balance itself out in the end.
-
- Posts: 3154
- Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2013 9:31 pm
Re: Goblin Town
As you say, I think PJ's indie ethic went out the window with LOTR's success.Lusitano wrote:Passdagas the Brown wrote: Agreed. Though I find this to be a problem in both AUJ and the LOTR trilogy. Through a combination of both set design, lighting and cinematography, the studio sets often look like studio sets! Location shooting (ahem, Rohan?) yields much more beautiful results.
I didnt find it to be much of a problem in the lotr trilogy. Though not all they could be, the different places in ME felt real and organic enough for me. Rivendell might be a little overlight with a golden atmosphere and two or three background paintings might not be as well accomplished as they possibly could, but nothing like AUJ's rivendell, which looks to me like an overlight studio set with digital backgrounds added afterwards.
Its interetsing to wonder what has happened to that brave, almost indie like unconformist, daring filmmaker, jackson , in my opinion, was, as far as location shootings.
Taking advantage of the organic and irreplaceable quality of nature and locations from NZ, was jacksons's motto for bringing Middle Earth to life in Lotr, wasnt it?
He seems to have lost that approach and learned to just settle with a lot more studio and green screen work. A very Lucasesque- if that's even a word- change.
For me, either of those three directors would be more interesting choices for MEarth, Alfonso, Weir or DelToro. I like many of their films, unlike jackson's own filmography and regard them as superior filmmakers.
Both Pan's Labyrinth and POA are great fantasy films, with more artistic merits and clear visions behind them than auj, imo.
Another interesting chocie could be Neil Jordan, who directed the gothic fairytale The Company of Wolves.
But I think it is not because hechanged. He's very much the same person, with the same taste. It is because he is simply more free to put exactly what he wants on screen, which exacerbates his worst tendencies.
I am a big believer in the idea that resource constraints in the arts breeds both inspiration and innovation. A genius director is great with $100 or $1 billion, but most directors, like PJ, are not disciplined enough to know when they are over-painting a canvas.
- Voronwë the Faithful
- At the intersection of here and now
- Posts: 46575
- Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 1:41 am
- Contact:
I moved the discussion about the similarity of the Goblintown scene to videogames to the already existing thread on the subject. The moved posts begin here.
"Spirits in the shape of hawks and eagles flew ever to and from his halls; and their eyes could see to the depths of the seas, and pierce the hidden caverns beneath the world."
-
- Posts: 3154
- Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2013 9:31 pm
- Voronwë the Faithful
- At the intersection of here and now
- Posts: 46575
- Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 1:41 am
- Contact:
Based on what you have seen in trailers, or based on her past performances.
If I judged Martin Freeman on what I saw of him in the AUJ trailers, I would have been sure that they made a terrible mistake in casting him as Bilbo.
If I judged Martin Freeman on what I saw of him in the AUJ trailers, I would have been sure that they made a terrible mistake in casting him as Bilbo.
"Spirits in the shape of hawks and eagles flew ever to and from his halls; and their eyes could see to the depths of the seas, and pierce the hidden caverns beneath the world."
-
- Posts: 3154
- Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2013 9:31 pm
- Voronwë the Faithful
- At the intersection of here and now
- Posts: 46575
- Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 1:41 am
- Contact:
I have never seen an episode of Lost, nor anything else that Lilly has been in. Then again, the only thing that I had see Freeman in was Hitchhiker's Guide, and I disliked that quite a bit.
In any event, most of Freeman's lines came across bizarre the way they are cut in the trailers. For instance, the pauses that he puts in the lines about not minding visitors sound very strange, out of context. I've seen some things in the trailers from Lilly that I like, and some that I do not, but I am quite confident that we have not seen enough to judge.
In any event, most of Freeman's lines came across bizarre the way they are cut in the trailers. For instance, the pauses that he puts in the lines about not minding visitors sound very strange, out of context. I've seen some things in the trailers from Lilly that I like, and some that I do not, but I am quite confident that we have not seen enough to judge.
"Spirits in the shape of hawks and eagles flew ever to and from his halls; and their eyes could see to the depths of the seas, and pierce the hidden caverns beneath the world."
-
- Posts: 3154
- Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2013 9:31 pm
- Voronwë the Faithful
- At the intersection of here and now
- Posts: 46575
- Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 1:41 am
- Contact:
You've expressed so much excitement about so many other aspects of this film, you have to have something to complain about (other than poor Orlando Bloom).
"Spirits in the shape of hawks and eagles flew ever to and from his halls; and their eyes could see to the depths of the seas, and pierce the hidden caverns beneath the world."