Voronwë_the_Faithful wrote:
I agree. As I've already admitted, I excel at mental yoga.
Quite the contortionist.
I should point out that my idea requires a radical rethinking of Morgoth's power. As Finrod states in the
Athrabeth
But never even in the night have we believed that [Melkor] could prevail against the Children of Eru. This one he might cozen, or that one he might corrupt; but to change the doom of a whole people of the Children, to rob them of their inheritance; if he could do that in Eru's despite, then greater and more terrible is he by far than we guessed ...
Finrod was, of course, talking about Man's mortality, not the creation of the Orcs, but still, the point remains. For him to have had the ability to change the fate of a portion of the Children of Eru is unfathomable.
But Voronwë, in the Athrabeth thread when we discussed 'The Tale of Adenel' you distinctly said ...
But as I pointed out earlier, the Tale is most definitively not part of the Athrabeth. I think that is of critical importance. The Athrabeth, like most of the the stores of the Elder Days, is very much a part of Eldarin lore, infused with the wisdom and greater understanding of the first born. The Tale of Adanel, on the other hand, is not at all part of that lore. Tolkien makes it very clear that in contrast to the the Athrabeth itself (not to mention the Quenta Silmarillion, the Valaquenta, the Ainulindalë, and even the Akallabêth, this tale is part of the lore of men. It is not meant to be taken as "truth" as in a true depiction of what Eru did to mankind, but rather as a glimpse into how mankind was led astray the result of, as Tolkien put it in the Silmarillion, how "Melkor has cast his shadow upon it [the Gift of Death], and confounded it with darkness, and brought forth evil out of good, and fear out of hope."
To put it another, perhaps more succinct way, the Tale isn't meant to show what really happened, it is meant to show how Man's perspective about what really happened got warped.
A contradiction, no?
On the one hand you state that the tale is not factual ... and on the other, you say it is proof that if Melkor had the power to change the fate of Men then he must therefore have had the power to separate fëa from hröa and go on to breed these souless creatures in the millions.
So which is it?
And by the by, if Melkor could change the fate of Men ... death could hardly be considered
a gift now could it? Besides, if Men were intended to be immortal they would be .... Elves!
Unless even the creation of the Orcs were part of Eru's plan.
No, they were an ill-thought out part of Tolkien's plan. He needed bad guys to be the minions of Morgoth and Sauron and he didn't think through the consequences of personalized evil with Elven roots.
Let's face it. Trying to rationalize Orcs is futile. Unless you enjoy the exercise for its own sake
The concept can withstand only so much mental gymnastics before it collapses upon itself.
Tolkien made a mistake.