It is currently Sun Dec 16, 2018 1:29 am

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 11 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon May 21, 2012 10:48 am 
Offline
Throw me a rope.
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 11:13 pm
Posts: 5996
Location: Deep in Oz
From http://www.haaretz.com/opinion/the-bodi ... y-1.431695

My interest in this article was prompted because the writer is an old friend from Melbourne, who moved to the US almost 20 years ago before moving again to Jerusalem.

But my interest was also spurred because of passing debate which occurred in another thread about the treatment of the dead human body.

It is my strongly held belief that the respectful treatment of a human corpse is one of the ethical measures of a civilised society. That is one of the questions raised in this article and by the exhibition it discusses, but beyond that, there is also the question of the provenance of the bodies being used.

I'm interested in what others think of the issues posited.

I've copied the whole article below in case Ha'arets disappears it.

Danny Schiff in Ha'aretz wrote:
The Bodies exhibition is coming to Israel, and it's an ethical travesty

By Danny Schiff | May.21, 2012 | 11:10 AM

It is indeed a disturbing commentary on our society if we are really so cavalier about the use and abuse of bodies in a way that denies the very humanity that the body once housed.

The “Bodies” are back. Apparently, the success of the “Body Worlds” show, which has attracted 34 million visitors in over 20 U.S. cities and worldwide, and which toured Haifa in 2010, persuaded promoters that the Israeli public is hungry for another version. So “Bodies: The Exhibition” will open in Tel Aviv on Monday.

From an ethical perspective, it’s a travesty. Here’s why:

In the last decade, “Bodies: The Exhibition” has been displayed at numerous venues around the world. In the name of education, it presents whole and partial human bodies that have been permanently plastinated in a range of poses, many with their skin flayed, their nervous systems dissected, their genitalia exposed, or in other troubling ways.

Among the many concerns raised by the exhibition, perhaps the most critical question is this: are the bodies on display in fact those of executed Chinese prisoners who never consented to have their remains put on show, and whose executions might have been expedited by the desire to profit from the sale of their bodies to the exhibition promoter? The show’s producer, Premier, has never adequately responded to these serious charges.

It is for this reason that in May 2008, the New York Attorney General arrived at a settlement with Premier by which the exhibition could remain open in New York provided that they posted signs warning visitors that Premier could not “independently verify that they [the bodies and body parts] do not belong to persons executed while incarcerated in Chinese prisons.”

In mid-2009, Hawaii became the first jurisdiction in the U.S. to shut down “Bodies,” after the state issued a legal ban on exhibitions that sought “commercial profit” from bodies of unknown provenance.

In September 2010, the French courts went even further: they banned the show on the basis of the French Civil Code, which states that “the respect due to the human body does not end with death, and the remains of the deceased must be treated… with respect, dignity, and decency.”

Yet none of these well-documented actions seems to have been the cause for any pause in bringing the show to Israel.

To be sure, the organizers expect that there will be rumblings from the “religious community.” But can it really be that only the religious community has potential objections? The legislators in Hawaii and the jurists in France were not part of any “religious community.”

This is a Jewish state. Surely the insights of Judaism on these matters are not solely significant to those who are “religious?”

From a Jewish perspective, there are at least five objections to this regrettable display:

First, when death occurs, Judaism invokes the principle of kevod ha-met, the honor due to the dead individual. Honoring the dead means handling a body with all the dignity that would be in evidence if the person were alive. Kevod ha-met also implies that the body should be restored to the earth, the dust from whence we came, as expeditiously as possible. Consequently, preserving a body is anathema to Jewish tradition. Embalming was seen as “Egyptian practice,” only to be undertaken in exceptional circumstances. How much the more so would Judaism forcefully reject the permanent plastination of the body.

Second, Judaism is opposed to any viewing of the dead. Once the soul has departed from the body, the body, though precious, represents the husk of what was a living human person. The true essence of what constituted the “divine image” has departed. From the standpoint of Judaism, to view the dead is an unacceptable breach of propriety. When we behold the dead, we see individuals in what is literally a dehumanized state.

Third, the tradition directly instructs that one may not profit from a dead body. Those staging the exhibition are in plain transgression of this precept.

Fourth is the problem of exploitation. If the bodies are those of prisoners who were mistreated or murdered, then these horrors cannot be erased. There are Jewish law experts who maintain that Nazi scientific data can only be ethically utilized if the results yield an undeniable “great value to humanity.” The “Bodies” exhibition certainly does not meet this criterion. Even granted that the show has educational merit, there is nothing to be learned there that cannot be apprehended in various other effective ways that are without ethical taint.

Fifth, is the issue of met mitzva, the unclaimed corpse. The promoters maintain that the bodies on display are not those of prisoners, but are unclaimed corpses. Even if this is true, Jewish tradition holds that we have a duty to bury an abandoned body immediately. If necessary, the High Priest himself was to become ritually impure on behalf of such an individual. For Jews, the fact that a corpse is “unclaimed” provides us with no license to use it for our own purposes.

There will be those who will say that these practices apply to Jews and Jewish bodies, and not to non-Jews and non-Jewish bodies. It should be clear, however, that Jews ought not to be party to the desecration or degradation of any human body.

None of these high ideals of Judaism will be in evidence in Tel Aviv. The “exhibits” will not be treated as “persons,” afforded the full dignity of the humanity that was once a part of them, but as “things” to be sliced, propped, and displayed to serve our entertainment purposes. They will not be allowed to “return to the dust,” or to lie in peace. Pretending to serve some indispensible educational goal, the exhibition will present death preserved indefinitely, stripped of all humanity, and treated as a sensational spectacle.

It is indeed a disturbing commentary on our society if we are really so cavalier about the use and abuse of bodies in a way that denies the very humanity that the body once housed. We can, and should, do better.

Danny Schiff served as the Community Scholar for the Pittsburgh Jewish community for 16 years before moving to Jerusalem in 2009. He is the author of Abortion in Judaism (Cambridge).

_________________
Mornings wouldn't suck so badly if they came later in the day.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 21, 2012 12:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 06, 2008 9:40 pm
Posts: 141
Location: The Great Northwest
I never investigated the Bodies exhibit before I attended it. I no longer judge things from a religious context and found it interesting and informative.

Based on the article, I can understand how objectionable it would be through the precepts of Judaism.

_________________
"Ut Prosim"
"There are some things that it is better to begin than refuse, even though the end may be dark" Aragorn
"Those who commit honorable acts need no forgiveness"
http://killology.com/sheep_dog.htm


Last edited by Folca on Mon May 21, 2012 12:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 21, 2012 12:31 pm 
Offline
Pleasantly Twisted
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2006 6:35 pm
Posts: 8996
Location: Black Creek Bottoms
The question of the provenance of the corpses is a valid one, and one I frankly think this show in particular had done a bad job of it.

Other than that, similar shows with better paper trails have come and gone, and I register my ethical discomfort with them as a concept by not going, not by insisting they cease to exist. When you donate your body to science, it includes science education, whether med school or more...general audiences.

_________________

Resentment is no excuse for baldface stupidity.
-- Garrison Keillor

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 21, 2012 1:26 pm 
Offline
Throw me a rope.
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 11:13 pm
Posts: 5996
Location: Deep in Oz
I think that's one of the issues here - did the living persons in fact donate their dead bodies to science?

_________________
Mornings wouldn't suck so badly if they came later in the day.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 21, 2012 1:30 pm 
Offline
Pleasantly Twisted
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2006 6:35 pm
Posts: 8996
Location: Black Creek Bottoms
Some of these exhibition have more convincing paper trails than others. I believe shows that can't present a preponderance of verifiable evidence for legal, ethical acquisition of the bodies should be barred from exhibiting.

It would be useful to know just how common the practice of voluntary body donation is in China.

_________________

Resentment is no excuse for baldface stupidity.
-- Garrison Keillor

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 21, 2012 2:14 pm 
Offline
Throw me a rope.
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 11:13 pm
Posts: 5996
Location: Deep in Oz
I don't know Ax; my curiosity about this article was more intellectual with regards to the issues it raises.

_________________
Mornings wouldn't suck so badly if they came later in the day.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 21, 2012 2:37 pm 
Offline
Pleasantly Twisted
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2006 6:35 pm
Posts: 8996
Location: Black Creek Bottoms
Well, as Folca said, I can definitely see this being a bit of a hard sell among practicing Jews, even were the paper trail on the bodies not in dispute.

I think going from there to "Israel shouldn't allow this sort of exhibit" is a question the electorate and their representatives in Israel should determine.

_________________

Resentment is no excuse for baldface stupidity.
-- Garrison Keillor

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 21, 2012 2:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2010 1:31 am
Posts: 842
Location: Canada
Impenitent wrote:
I don't know Ax; my curiosity about this article was more intellectual with regards to the issues it raises.


Issues? Do you mean, setting aside the question of its legality, how can a show like this be profitable anywhere in the world and in Israel in particular? A similar question struck me while researching human trafficking. For some reason I was surprised to learn that Tel Aviv is one of the major distribution points for people (slaves) trafficked out of Eastern Europe.

In other words is your question about the apparent disparity between what should be cultural norms and some practices in religious states?


Last edited by SirDennis on Mon May 21, 2012 3:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 21, 2012 3:00 pm 
Offline
Lali Beag Bídeach
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 16, 2005 4:42 pm
Posts: 13622
Location: Rivendell
When it came to Cincinnati, I wouldn't go see it. I am not squeamish, by any means, and have worked with cadavers as part of my education. That's a different thing, imo, however, than this exhibit. I was bothered by the ambiguity surrounding the source of these cadavers, and I would tend to agree with many of the Jewish traditions outlined in the article, even as a Christian. It felt wrong to me for these bodies to be displayed in this way. I may not be able to defend that feeling very well, but there you go.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 21, 2012 4:44 pm 
Offline
Meanwhile...
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 10:31 pm
Posts: 14396
Location: Out on the banks
I do find the idea ethically abhorrent. What can be done with dead humans for educational and artistic purposes that cannot be achieved with plastic? It's treating people as things, even dead people, and that's what sin is.* I

I do not necessarily think the exhibition ought to be illegal, however. Outlawing things because one does not like them is not my favorite approach, where actual harm cannot be shown. Boycotting, yes. Protesting, yes.

The article makes a much more serious charge than mere breach of good taste - it claims that the person who procured the bodies may have been indirectly responsible for hastening the deaths of prisoners.

I do think that there needs to be a very clear disclosure that the bodies came from people who were fine with them being used in such manner. Unclaimed bodies should not be used as it is almost certain that the body's inhabitant's wishes would be quite different. Donated to science bodies should not be used, as most people would imagine their bodies helping train doctors or playing part in life saving research, not flayed and frozen with tennis rackets in hands.

However, if it can be shown that the person, while alive, was cool with being made into a statue, then I would not see a legal issue. I still don't want anything to do with it, though.

_________________
Image
“It may help to understand human affairs to be clear that most of the great triumphs and tragedies of history are caused, not by people being fundamentally good or fundamentally bad, but by people being fundamentally people.”

- Terry Pratchett & Neil Gaiman, Good Omens


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 21, 2012 6:21 pm 
Offline
Reads while walking
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 11:05 pm
Posts: 4639
If those bodies are actually executed Chinese prisoners, then I vote Ethical Travesty.

:(


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 11 posts ] 

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group