Too late?
Re: Should you punch a Nazi? The limits of tolerance
Recruitment tour, remember? Making arguments against Nazism only gives the Nazis a platform to make arguments in favor. It's like arguing which way is up - you just know, unless something is seriously wrong with you.
If there was anything that depressed him more than his own cynicism, it was that quite often it still wasn't as cynical as real life.
Terry Pratchett, Guards! Guards!
Terry Pratchett, Guards! Guards!
- Túrin Turambar
- Posts: 6153
- Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2005 9:37 am
- Location: Melbourne, Victoria
Re: Should you punch a Nazi? The limits of tolerance
I'm not persuaded that Richard Spencer will be seriously harmed by not being able to speak at Universities as I get the impression most of his support comes from the non-tertiary educated. And I can't imagine he was welcome to get many invitations to speak at universities, anyway. But it's very hard to gather the evidence to answer these questions.
- Impenitent
- Throw me a rope.
- Posts: 7262
- Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2005 12:13 am
- Location: Deep in Oz
Re: Should you punch a Nazi? The limits of tolerance
I find it very difficult to address this question.
While I have a very visceral reaction to the idea of allowing a Nazi - or an avowed and proud racist - to spew forth from any platform, history teaches that you can't kill an idea through violence or by attempting to silence its advocates.
When I was a young teen, I remember having bitter arguments with a man my mother was dating for a short time who was very racist and antisemitic. He was also an intelligent, urbane man who used sophisticated debating techniques that I could not match at my age, and those arguments (never in my mother's presence) left me shaking, sometimes even crying, with rage. I remember the temptation to rant and swear at him, to throw things, to hit his smug face - but I also knew that would not give me an intellectual or moral victory. There was a terrible feeling of impotence in knowing that he would never admit or see his position was wrong.
Sent from a tiny phone keyboard via Tapatalk - typos inevitable.
While I have a very visceral reaction to the idea of allowing a Nazi - or an avowed and proud racist - to spew forth from any platform, history teaches that you can't kill an idea through violence or by attempting to silence its advocates.
When I was a young teen, I remember having bitter arguments with a man my mother was dating for a short time who was very racist and antisemitic. He was also an intelligent, urbane man who used sophisticated debating techniques that I could not match at my age, and those arguments (never in my mother's presence) left me shaking, sometimes even crying, with rage. I remember the temptation to rant and swear at him, to throw things, to hit his smug face - but I also knew that would not give me an intellectual or moral victory. There was a terrible feeling of impotence in knowing that he would never admit or see his position was wrong.
Sent from a tiny phone keyboard via Tapatalk - typos inevitable.
Mornings wouldn't suck so badly if they came later in the day.
- Dave_LF
- Wrong within normal parameters
- Posts: 6813
- Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2006 10:59 am
- Location: The other side of Michigan
Re: Should you punch a Nazi? The limits of tolerance
Well; except for (paleo) Nazism...Impenitent wrote:history teaches that you can't kill an idea through violence or by attempting to silence its advocates.
- Impenitent
- Throw me a rope.
- Posts: 7262
- Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2005 12:13 am
- Location: Deep in Oz
Re: Should you punch a Nazi? The limits of tolerance
Dave, can you clarify?
Sent from a tiny phone keyboard via Tapatalk - typos inevitable.
Sent from a tiny phone keyboard via Tapatalk - typos inevitable.
Mornings wouldn't suck so badly if they came later in the day.
- Dave_LF
- Wrong within normal parameters
- Posts: 6813
- Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2006 10:59 am
- Location: The other side of Michigan
Re: Should you punch a Nazi? The limits of tolerance
Just that it was violence that stopped the original Nazis. One can't use that as justification to get violent with neo-Nazis because the circumstances are totally different, but I don't think it's correct to say that violence never stopped an idea.
Re: Should you punch a Nazi? The limits of tolerance
In fact, it's the only thing that ever did, for good and terrible reasons.
ETA: so that got me thinking - have humans ever given up an idea simply based on the fact that it was, logically, a really stupid idea? I'm coming up empty. There were times when new, emerging ideas replaced old ones, but was it ever without violence?
ETA: so that got me thinking - have humans ever given up an idea simply based on the fact that it was, logically, a really stupid idea? I'm coming up empty. There were times when new, emerging ideas replaced old ones, but was it ever without violence?
If there was anything that depressed him more than his own cynicism, it was that quite often it still wasn't as cynical as real life.
Terry Pratchett, Guards! Guards!
Terry Pratchett, Guards! Guards!
- RoseMorninStar
- Posts: 12945
- Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2007 11:07 am
- Location: North Shire
Re: Should you punch a Nazi? The limits of tolerance
Impy, what an awful situation.Impenitent wrote: When I was a young teen, I remember having bitter arguments with a man my mother was dating for a short time who was very racist and antisemitic. He was also an intelligent, urbane man who used sophisticated debating techniques that I could not match at my age, and those arguments (never in my mother's presence) left me shaking, sometimes even crying, with rage. I remember the temptation to rant and swear at him, to throw things, to hit his smug face - but I also knew that would not give me an intellectual or moral victory. There was a terrible feeling of impotence in knowing that he would never admit or see his position was wrong.
We have young earth creationist neighbors who can easily talk circles around me (and most people I would imagine) using sophisticated debating techniques. Anyone who does not believe as they do is 'going to hell'. Under normal circumstances, I wouldn't care (to each his own/tolerance, etc..) but they have taken their crusade and done a good job of creating division and havoc not just in our town and local libraries and public schools, but have agitated for their cause across the state. I've been told they are well known in such circles across the country. The thing is, these people, just like nazi's, are tiring to deal with. It is expensive to deal with them. People become apathetic because they just don't want to deal with it and give up and they get their way.
This was a depressing exercise. :/Frelga wrote:ETA: so that got me thinking - have humans ever given up an idea simply based on the fact that it was, logically, a really stupid idea? I'm coming up empty. There were times when new, emerging ideas replaced old ones, but was it ever without violence?
My heart is forever in the Shire.
Re: Should you punch a Nazi? The limits of tolerance
I don't really understand what you mean, Frelga. The enormous shift on public opinion of gays that has happened in my lifetime, for example, certainly didn't happen because of violence. I know there were some violent incidents along the way (most famous at Stonewall) but if you were to ask what changed people's mind, it was largely done by making good arguments in favor of gay equality.
I think the opposite is a more realistic question - has violence ever convinced people of anything? Or had it just made them afraid to express the views they still hold?
I think the opposite is a more realistic question - has violence ever convinced people of anything? Or had it just made them afraid to express the views they still hold?
I wanna love somebody but I don't know how
I wanna throw my body in the river and drown
-The Decemberists
I wanna throw my body in the river and drown
-The Decemberists
Re: Should you punch a Nazi? The limits of tolerance
It did stop the Nazis, but not necessarily their ideas! That is a huge difference.Dave_LF wrote:Just that it was violence that stopped the original Nazis. One can't use that as justification to get violent with neo-Nazis because the circumstances are totally different, but I don't think it's correct to say that violence never stopped an idea.
"nolite te bastardes carborundorum".
Re: Should you punch a Nazi? The limits of tolerance
Yov, the idea that people should not be denied basic rights because of other people's beliefs is... I don't even know if it counts as an idea. Besides, many of the strides in favor of equally based on race, gender, sexual orientation were made not by changing people's mind but through winning and enforcing court decisions.
Cue photos of Ruby Bridges.
And look at the reactionary laws being passed now.
As for your second question, I think so. Take Christianity. As the Russian chronicler wrote, it was spread by fire and sword, and yet there is no doubt that later generations embraced it sincerely, even accounting for the violence inherent in the system against those who did not so embrace it.
Rose is right, history is depressing.
Cue photos of Ruby Bridges.
And look at the reactionary laws being passed now.
As for your second question, I think so. Take Christianity. As the Russian chronicler wrote, it was spread by fire and sword, and yet there is no doubt that later generations embraced it sincerely, even accounting for the violence inherent in the system against those who did not so embrace it.
Rose is right, history is depressing.
If there was anything that depressed him more than his own cynicism, it was that quite often it still wasn't as cynical as real life.
Terry Pratchett, Guards! Guards!
Terry Pratchett, Guards! Guards!
Re: Should you punch a Nazi? The limits of tolerance
Speaking as an Eastern European Jew - close enough for me.Nin wrote:It did stop the Nazis, but not necessarily their ideas! That is a huge difference.Dave_LF wrote:Just that it was violence that stopped the original Nazis. One can't use that as justification to get violent with neo-Nazis because the circumstances are totally different, but I don't think it's correct to say that violence never stopped an idea.
If there was anything that depressed him more than his own cynicism, it was that quite often it still wasn't as cynical as real life.
Terry Pratchett, Guards! Guards!
Terry Pratchett, Guards! Guards!
- Dave_LF
- Wrong within normal parameters
- Posts: 6813
- Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2006 10:59 am
- Location: The other side of Michigan
Re: Should you punch a Nazi? The limits of tolerance
An idea can't really be "killed", by violence or anything else; it can only be rendered powerless for the time being.
Re: Should you punch a Nazi? The limits of tolerance
Court decisions change behavior, they don't change minds. Minds have changed dramatically in my life time on the topic of homosexuality. Those minds were not changed by violence or by laws.Frelga wrote: . Besides, many of the strides in favor of equally based on race, gender, sexual orientation were made not by changing people's mind but through winning and enforcing court decisions.
I wanna love somebody but I don't know how
I wanna throw my body in the river and drown
-The Decemberists
I wanna throw my body in the river and drown
-The Decemberists
Re: Should you punch a Nazi? The limits of tolerance
Arguments work in courts. Violence works on streets. But minds get changed through exposure. Present a well-crafted argument to a homophobe on why they need to get over it and they'll likely shut/double down. Their feelings are more important to them than your facts. But just be your fabulous and gay self and eventually the homophobe either rejects you or carves out an exception for you. Introduce them to your friends and they'll carve out more exceptions until the list of "Gays are bad except for...." gets too long to maintain and they get over it.
I literally saw this happen in my own family, BTW.
TT: I think Richard Spencer was looking for attention. Even if touring campuses and inciting outrage that made it to television didn't win him new followers on the campuses themselves, it got him exposure and accolades in the circles he wanted exposure in and accolades from. And that would win him converts.
I literally saw this happen in my own family, BTW.
TT: I think Richard Spencer was looking for attention. Even if touring campuses and inciting outrage that made it to television didn't win him new followers on the campuses themselves, it got him exposure and accolades in the circles he wanted exposure in and accolades from. And that would win him converts.
When you can do nothing what can you do?
Re: Should you punch a Nazi? The limits of tolerance
Exposure was a huge part of the change in attitudes towards gays but it is not enough by itself. Certainly exposure didn't help blacks a whole lot.
People often say that arguments don't work against hate but I think that is false. One random person's argument might not, but the arguments of 100s and 1,000s of people over years of time can, and often does, shift people's minds.
People often say that arguments don't work against hate but I think that is false. One random person's argument might not, but the arguments of 100s and 1,000s of people over years of time can, and often does, shift people's minds.
I wanna love somebody but I don't know how
I wanna throw my body in the river and drown
-The Decemberists
I wanna throw my body in the river and drown
-The Decemberists
- Primula Baggins
- Living in hope
- Posts: 40005
- Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 1:43 am
- Location: Sailing the luminiferous aether
- Contact:
Re: Should you punch a Nazi? The limits of tolerance
I think there are whole categories of people for whom argument as such means nothing. Some are people who "know what they know" and no one can tell them anything different. They know what the world is really like, and who does and who does not deserve to live, or live in peace.
Some are people who believe in a God who hates exactly the people they hate and want to keep hating. So it's out of their hands; their God's will trumps rational argument. They can go on TV and weep about murdered gay people because it's so sad that the victims never understood that all they had to do was change into somebody entirely unlike themselves, and God might have prevented their deaths.
What I've seen work on people like this is irrational argument: someone they love who they discover is gay. It doesn't always work, of course; people can be very hateful if they think they're following God's will. But sometimes the change is remarkable. And maybe the same change can be worked less dramatically as more and more people feel able to be open about their lives. Decades ago I used to hear people say that of course they didn't know anyone who was gay. They didn't hang out where gay people hang out! And all the time they had no idea how many gay people they knew, including some of their kids' teachers, neighbors, the guy at the hardware shop, maybe their boss. . . . Now they're more likely to be aware of this. Maybe that alone can change some people over time.
And, of course, kids growing up now live in a different world. Thank God.
Some are people who believe in a God who hates exactly the people they hate and want to keep hating. So it's out of their hands; their God's will trumps rational argument. They can go on TV and weep about murdered gay people because it's so sad that the victims never understood that all they had to do was change into somebody entirely unlike themselves, and God might have prevented their deaths.
What I've seen work on people like this is irrational argument: someone they love who they discover is gay. It doesn't always work, of course; people can be very hateful if they think they're following God's will. But sometimes the change is remarkable. And maybe the same change can be worked less dramatically as more and more people feel able to be open about their lives. Decades ago I used to hear people say that of course they didn't know anyone who was gay. They didn't hang out where gay people hang out! And all the time they had no idea how many gay people they knew, including some of their kids' teachers, neighbors, the guy at the hardware shop, maybe their boss. . . . Now they're more likely to be aware of this. Maybe that alone can change some people over time.
And, of course, kids growing up now live in a different world. Thank God.
“There, peeping among the cloud-wrack above a dark tor high up in the mountains, Sam saw a white star twinkle for a while. The beauty of it smote his heart, as he looked up out of the forsaken land, and hope returned to him. For like a shaft, clear and cold, the thought pierced him that in the end the Shadow was only a small and passing thing: there was light and high beauty for ever beyond its reach.”
― J.R.R. Tolkien, The Return of the King
― J.R.R. Tolkien, The Return of the King
Re: Should you punch a Nazi? The limits of tolerance
I dunno. The Civil Rights Movement only happened because black people got tired of staying in their "place". After civil disobedience, law suits, and legislation happened, the rest of the country had to get exposed to black people doing things like sitting at the same lunch counter, swimming in the same pools, voting for their representatives in government (the nerve!!) and attending the same schools. Now no one thinks twice about such things, but if you spend a couple seconds with Google you'll find pictures of black kids entering schools flanked by armed guards.yovargas wrote:Exposure was a huge part of the change in attitudes towards gays but it is not enough by itself. Certainly exposure didn't help blacks a whole lot.
When you can do nothing what can you do?
- Cenedril_Gildinaur
- Posts: 1076
- Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 7:01 pm
Re: Should you punch a Nazi? The limits of tolerance
That was a war. That is more than a little different from a protestor saying "your ideology is ugly therefore I will punch you."Dave_LF wrote:Just that it was violence that stopped the original Nazis. One can't use that as justification to get violent with neo-Nazis because the circumstances are totally different, but I don't think it's correct to say that violence never stopped an idea.
"If you love wealth more than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, depart from us in peace. We ask not your counsel nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you. May your chains rest lightly upon you and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen."
-- Samuel Adams
-- Samuel Adams
- RoseMorninStar
- Posts: 12945
- Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2007 11:07 am
- Location: North Shire
Re: Should you punch a Nazi? The limits of tolerance
I'm not sure if this article has been posted here. It came out last year a month or so after this thread started. I did a quick look and didn't see it posted.
Ex-Neo Nazis Explain What's Driving the Alt-Right
Ex-Neo Nazis Explain What's Driving the Alt-Right
My heart is forever in the Shire.