Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia is dead
Re: Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia is dead
It does seem like it would be a better strategy for Republicans, to allow votes and reject the nominees, than to refuse to take up the nominations at all, which could more easily be seen as obstructing the constitutional process.
Avatar photo by Richard Lykes, used with permission.
- Dave_LF
- Wrong within normal parameters
- Posts: 6813
- Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2006 10:59 am
- Location: The other side of Michigan
Re: Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia is dead
Maybe, if half of them hadn't run on promises to obstruct the government.
Re: Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia is dead
McConnell saying that the voters should get a say in this (his justification for not bringing up any nomination) ignores the fact that the voters elected and re-elected Obama. Most of them knowing full well that his obligation is to appoint judges and SCOTUS justices.
McConnell is being typically disingenuous. And Cruz promising to filibuster any Obama nominee is being typically Cruz.
McConnell is being typically disingenuous. And Cruz promising to filibuster any Obama nominee is being typically Cruz.
Re: Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia is dead
Any chance that Obama himself could be nominated if they drag this out long enough? (I saw that possibility being floated around out there but am skeptical of its viability.)
Re: Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia is dead
Isn't the Supreme Court NOT being elected kinda the point?CosmicBob wrote:McConnell saying that the voters should get a say in this (his justification for not bringing up any nomination) ignores the fact that the voters elected and re-elected Obama. Most of them knowing full well that his obligation is to appoint judges and SCOTUS justices.
McConnell is being typically disingenuous. And Cruz promising to filibuster any Obama nominee is being typically Cruz.
If there was anything that depressed him more than his own cynicism, it was that quite often it still wasn't as cynical as real life.
Terry Pratchett, Guards! Guards!
Terry Pratchett, Guards! Guards!
- Dave_LF
- Wrong within normal parameters
- Posts: 6813
- Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2006 10:59 am
- Location: The other side of Michigan
Re: Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia is dead
He doesn't want it (or that's what he says, anyway). But it would make great theater.Lalaith wrote:Any chance that Obama himself could be nominated if they drag this out long enough? (I saw that possibility being floated around out there but am skeptical of its viability.)
- Voronwë the Faithful
- At the intersection of here and now
- Posts: 46194
- Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 1:41 am
- Contact:
Re: Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia is dead
Except that if they allow hearings and a vote on a specific nominee, particularly one who is appealing and qualified, and then vote that person down, there is a face to their obstructionism, which could make it even worse. Either way, I think they are backed into a corner.Cerin wrote:It does seem like it would be a better strategy for Republicans, to allow votes and reject the nominees, than to refuse to take up the nominations at all, which could more easily be seen as obstructing the constitutional process.
"Spirits in the shape of hawks and eagles flew ever to and from his halls; and their eyes could see to the depths of the seas, and pierce the hidden caverns beneath the world."
- Voronwë the Faithful
- At the intersection of here and now
- Posts: 46194
- Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 1:41 am
- Contact:
Re: Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia is dead
Here's a fun scenario to consider, which is possible (not that I think there is a remote possibility of it happening). Lets say the GOP stays firm on refusing to consider any nominee, no matter how qualified, no matter how moderate, that Obama nominates. And lets say that in the presidential election they still win (with President-elect Rubio and Vice President-elect Kasich taking their respective home states which have been the two biggest swing states in recent elections) but the Democrats gaining a net four seats in the Senate (a distinct possibility, made greater by the vulnerable GOP Senators supporting the obstructionism). The new Senate gets seated on January 3, 2017. However, President Obama and Vice President Biden are still in office until January 20, 2017. During those 17 days, Obama could appoint however he wanted to, and any tie in the Senate would be broken by Biden! A couple of years ago the Senate eliminated the filibuster for all judicial appointments other than Supreme Court appointments. They could, however, ram through a new rule that extends that to include SCOTUS appointments, with Biden providing the tie-breaking vote. And then Obama could appoint himself, and the Senate could confirm him, with Biden providing the tie-breaking vote.
It could happen. It won't, but it could.
It could happen. It won't, but it could.
"Spirits in the shape of hawks and eagles flew ever to and from his halls; and their eyes could see to the depths of the seas, and pierce the hidden caverns beneath the world."
Re: Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia is dead
Heads would explode! It would be funny to watch, that's for sure.Voronwë the Faithful wrote:Here's a fun scenario to consider, which is possible (not that I think there is a remote possibility of it happening). Lets say the GOP stays firm on refusing to consider any nominee, no matter how qualified, no matter how moderate, that Obama nominates. And lets say that in the presidential election they still win (with President-elect Rubio and Vice President-elect Kasich taking their respective home states which have been the two biggest swing states in recent elections) but the Democrats gaining a net four seats in the Senate (a distinct possibility, made greater by the vulnerable GOP Senators supporting the obstructionism). The new Senate gets seated on January 3, 2017. However, President Obama and Vice President Biden are still in office until January 20, 2017. During those 17 days, Obama could appoint however he wanted to, and any tie in the Senate would be broken by Biden! A couple of years ago the Senate eliminated the filibuster for all judicial appointments other than Supreme Court appointments. They could, however, ram through a new rule that extends that to include SCOTUS appointments, with Biden providing the tie-breaking vote. And then Obama could appoint himself, and the Senate could confirm him, with Biden providing the tie-breaking vote.
It could happen. It won't, but it could.
Re: Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia is dead
Appointing oneself to a lifetime seat on the Supreme Court would be unseemly beyond words, and ethically questionable, imo. (Sorry to be a wet blanket, Voronwë.)
Avatar photo by Richard Lykes, used with permission.
- Primula Baggins
- Living in hope
- Posts: 40005
- Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 1:43 am
- Location: Sailing the luminiferous aether
- Contact:
Re: Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia is dead
Of course, Obama could use this same strategy and appoint a young, well-qualified progressive jurist rather than himself.
Heads would still explode, but the ethical issue would go away.
Heads would still explode, but the ethical issue would go away.
“There, peeping among the cloud-wrack above a dark tor high up in the mountains, Sam saw a white star twinkle for a while. The beauty of it smote his heart, as he looked up out of the forsaken land, and hope returned to him. For like a shaft, clear and cold, the thought pierced him that in the end the Shadow was only a small and passing thing: there was light and high beauty for ever beyond its reach.”
― J.R.R. Tolkien, The Return of the King
― J.R.R. Tolkien, The Return of the King
- Voronwë the Faithful
- At the intersection of here and now
- Posts: 46194
- Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 1:41 am
- Contact:
Re: Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia is dead
Cerin, I was not suggesting this as a real option, as I can't imagine you do not realize. Just a little playful fun.Cerin wrote:Appointing oneself to a lifetime seat on the Supreme Court would be unseemly beyond words, and ethically questionable, imo. (Sorry to be a wet blanket, Voronwë.)
"Spirits in the shape of hawks and eagles flew ever to and from his halls; and their eyes could see to the depths of the seas, and pierce the hidden caverns beneath the world."
Re: Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia is dead
Ooh! I have one! What if every one in the House gets voted out and replaced with aliens from the planet Xornon? And the Xornon house declares the constitution unconstitutional and replaces it with the Xornon Terms of Service, which they force the senate to approve since they totally can, due to the feared Xornon Pan-molecular Ray Balster? Then they fire all of the Supreme Court Justices (which they totally can too, see Ray Blaster) and then they bring Scalia back to life and clone him and set up the court with nine Antonin Scalias, only the cloning process goes wrong and the clones all metamorphosize into giant pandas and the U.S. Supreme Court is suddenly controlled by a zombie Scalia and an embarrassment of pandas?
It won’t happen, but it’s as likely as anything else at this point.
And Zombie Scalia and an Embarrassment of Pandas would be an awesome band name.
It won’t happen, but it’s as likely as anything else at this point.
And Zombie Scalia and an Embarrassment of Pandas would be an awesome band name.
- Primula Baggins
- Living in hope
- Posts: 40005
- Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 1:43 am
- Location: Sailing the luminiferous aether
- Contact:
Re: Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia is dead
<silently burns next novel>
“There, peeping among the cloud-wrack above a dark tor high up in the mountains, Sam saw a white star twinkle for a while. The beauty of it smote his heart, as he looked up out of the forsaken land, and hope returned to him. For like a shaft, clear and cold, the thought pierced him that in the end the Shadow was only a small and passing thing: there was light and high beauty for ever beyond its reach.”
― J.R.R. Tolkien, The Return of the King
― J.R.R. Tolkien, The Return of the King
- TheTennisBallKid
- Posts: 457
- Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2005 12:35 am
- Location: The East of East, Fighting Wild Were-worms in The Last Desert
- Contact:
Re: Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia is dead
I'm in favor of just replacing the entire House and the Senate with giant pandas anyway. It'd be like all the monkeys with all the typewriters writing the complete works Shakespeare. With lots of bamboo.
Glowah, eee chop glowah.
Ya glowah pee chu nee foom
Ah toot dee awe goon daa.
Glory, we found glory.
The power showed us the light,
And now we all live free.
Celebrate the light; (Freedom!)
Celebrate the might; (Power!)
Celebrate the fight; (Glory!)
Celebrate the love.
Ya glowah pee chu nee foom
Ah toot dee awe goon daa.
Glory, we found glory.
The power showed us the light,
And now we all live free.
Celebrate the light; (Freedom!)
Celebrate the might; (Power!)
Celebrate the fight; (Glory!)
Celebrate the love.
Re: Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia is dead
I wouldn't say as likely as anything else at this point. But both are very, very unlikely, yes.
( ttbk)
( ttbk)
I wanna love somebody but I don't know how
I wanna throw my body in the river and drown
-The Decemberists
I wanna throw my body in the river and drown
-The Decemberists
Re: Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia is dead
I like ttbk's idea!
And an Embarrassment of Pandas would be a great band name! I had kind of settled on Acoustic Shadows, though.
And an Embarrassment of Pandas would be a great band name! I had kind of settled on Acoustic Shadows, though.
Re: Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia is dead
You wouldn't want a band's performance to be dominated by acoustic shadows!
Re: Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia is dead
I prefer an Embarrassment of Acoustic Shadows.
I wanna love somebody but I don't know how
I wanna throw my body in the river and drown
-The Decemberists
I wanna throw my body in the river and drown
-The Decemberists
Re: Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia is dead
Prim, sorry.
ttbk, hey! I like pandas too! Although Acoustic Shadows sound pretty cool too.
And for the record, "Embarrassment" is in fact the proper term of venery for a group of pandas.
http://www.pets.ie/pet_talk/an-embarras ... f-animals/
And also for the record, I was not trying to be disrespectful or dismissive of a serious situation, just trying to inject a little levity.
ttbk, hey! I like pandas too! Although Acoustic Shadows sound pretty cool too.
And for the record, "Embarrassment" is in fact the proper term of venery for a group of pandas.
http://www.pets.ie/pet_talk/an-embarras ... f-animals/
And also for the record, I was not trying to be disrespectful or dismissive of a serious situation, just trying to inject a little levity.