"Progressive" and other political labels
- Primula Baggins
- Living in hope
- Posts: 40005
- Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 1:43 am
- Location: Sailing the luminiferous aether
- Contact:
I think the annoyance (at least in my case) is with people who don't feel they should be made to buy insurance because they "know" they'll never need it (yeah, right), but at bottom because they know (really know) that society will pick up the tab when they show up at the ER without insurance. They are free not to buy insurance, and the rest of us are "free" to pay for their smug lack of foresight through higher premiums and higher hospital fees.
“There, peeping among the cloud-wrack above a dark tor high up in the mountains, Sam saw a white star twinkle for a while. The beauty of it smote his heart, as he looked up out of the forsaken land, and hope returned to him. For like a shaft, clear and cold, the thought pierced him that in the end the Shadow was only a small and passing thing: there was light and high beauty for ever beyond its reach.”
― J.R.R. Tolkien, The Return of the King
― J.R.R. Tolkien, The Return of the King
- Cenedril_Gildinaur
- Posts: 1076
- Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 7:01 pm
It depends on the country.tinwë wrote:Don't most laws tell you what you can't do, not what you must do? Taxes being the obvious exception, but otherwise: you can't kill people, steal, cheat, lie, etc. Beyond that you are pretty much free to do whatever you want to do.
In the US, in general (and becoming less so), laws say certain activities are forbidden and anything else is allowed. But in more totalitarian countries laws say what is allowed and everything else is forbidden. And in some cases laws do mandate activity instead of merely forbidding some activity; you'll find those laws more often in the more totalitarian countries.
"If you love wealth more than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, depart from us in peace. We ask not your counsel nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you. May your chains rest lightly upon you and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen."
-- Samuel Adams
-- Samuel Adams
- Ghân-buri-Ghân
- Posts: 602
- Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2010 9:31 pm
- Location: Evading prying eyes
- Ghân-buri-Ghân
- Posts: 602
- Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2010 9:31 pm
- Location: Evading prying eyes
I think it has become more... insidious... than that. "Revolutionaries" are not simply being dispensed with post-revolution, but radical thought is being demonised prior to any "threat" of revolution.axordil wrote:Ask Tom Paine or Leon Trotsky or Saint-Just. Revolutionaries are useful up until the moment the revolution is done with them.
When, in 1992, Francis Fukyama wrote The End of History and the Last Man his central tenet was that, with liberal democracy, mankind had reached the zenith of sociocultural evolution; there was nowhere left to "progress" to. Radical thought rejects the status quo, but if the status quo is held to embody evolutionary maturation, maintenance of the status quo can be presented as defence against decline and fall.
This is, I believe, the reason why radicalism has become so demonised, and why anodyne, mutable, near meaningless terms such as "liberal", "progressive", even "conservative" are the sum total of allowable, acceptable "ideologies". In truth, they can, and often are, interchangeable. Neoliberals are bedfellows of Neoconservatives; Progressives are notable for their absence of radicalism. The whole is safely framed within a limited, corporatist landscape, with debate often reduced to something analogous to how many angels can dance on the head of a pin. The power elites who have most to fear by any real assault on this status quo control all major facets of society, including use of language. "Radicalism" is verboten...
And I think the poverty of political debate, (inter)nationally, ably illustrates this.
tenebris lux
- Ghân-buri-Ghân
- Posts: 602
- Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2010 9:31 pm
- Location: Evading prying eyes
I agree, although appealing to historical precedent may not be justified. Never before has there been such global reach, and with such immediacy.axordil wrote:This isn't the first time in history someone has posited that we can't go any further. It may simply be that given the current social and economic environment we're at political homeostasis. But not even Exxon-Mobil or News Corp. can control the laws of physics.
The communications age has, quite probably, changed the rule book...
tenebris lux
- Voronwë the Faithful
- At the intersection of here and now
- Posts: 46167
- Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 1:41 am
- Contact:
Liberal economist and political pundit Paul Krugman made a comment this morning that crystalized the concerns that I have about progressives. From the Huffington Post:
Now, mind you, I personally largely agree with his underlying point about the danger of cutting spending during an economic downturn (not that I know much about economics; it all seems pretty random to me). But the idea that only progressives are rational -- and thus that anyone who is not a progressive and doesn't agree with Krugman are automatically irrational -- is a most toxic concept. And in my experience, it is a common idea among progressives, more so than any other group. Obviously, everyone believes that there point of view is the right one, but without leaving room to acknowledge that intelligent, rational people can disagree, there can be no reasonable discourse."From the perspective of a rational person -- in other words a progressive -- we shouldn't be talking about spending cuts at all now," Krugman said during a roundtable discussion on ABCNews' This Week With Christiane Amanpour.
"Spirits in the shape of hawks and eagles flew ever to and from his halls; and their eyes could see to the depths of the seas, and pierce the hidden caverns beneath the world."
-
- This is Rome
- Posts: 5963
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 11:48 pm
- Location: Concrete Jungle by the Lagoon
I agree with you that it's a toxic concept. I do not agree with you that it is more common among progressives. If I had a dollar for every time I've heard a conservative acquaintance say, "Reality has a well-known conservative bias," or use words like "libtard," for instance, I'd be rich enough to be the beneficiary of said conservatives' tax policies.Voronwë the Faithful wrote:But the idea that only progressives are rational -- and thus that anyone who is not a progressive and doesn't agree with Krugman are automatically irrational -- is a most toxic concept. And in my experience, it is a common idea among progressives, more so than any other group.
Count me in as one progressive who agrees with this.Obviously, everyone believes that there point of view is the right one, but without leaving room to acknowledge that intelligent, rational people can disagree, there can be no reasonable discourse.
- Voronwë the Faithful
- At the intersection of here and now
- Posts: 46167
- Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 1:41 am
- Contact:
- axordil
- Pleasantly Twisted
- Posts: 8999
- Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2006 7:35 pm
- Location: Black Creek Bottoms
- Contact:
Not to mention the "liberal hunting permits" and bumper stickers with an armed "Minute Man" figure saying "Socialists you have been warned" (The O in Socialist was of course the Obama campaign logo.)If I had a dollar for every time I've heard a conservative acquaintance say, "Reality has a well-known conservative bias," or use words like "libtard," for instance, I'd be rich enough to be the beneficiary of said conservatives' tax policies.
I saw those today on a 15- year old rusty pickup in a fast food parking lot, along with a sticker that said "I am John Galt." I was tempted to get a sharpie and write in "No, John Galt wouldn't drive a POS like this."
- Ghân-buri-Ghân
- Posts: 602
- Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2010 9:31 pm
- Location: Evading prying eyes
No, no!! Not a real guy. One of Ayn Rand's characters in Atlas Shrugged. I can't remember the guy's name.Ghân-buri-Ghân wrote:Søren Kierkegaard?vison wrote:No, that Scandanavian philosopher would have, though. [Can't think of his name. Dag? Ragnar?]
How so?
In real life, I knew a man named Soren Sorenson. And another man named Anders Anderson. AND another man named Lars Larsen.
Them Norskis, eh?
Dig deeper.
- Primula Baggins
- Living in hope
- Posts: 40005
- Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 1:43 am
- Location: Sailing the luminiferous aether
- Contact:
Saves time when the nurse is standing there with the birth certificate and a pen, and Gunnar hasn't had any coffee or any beer in 24 hours, and Lena is still swearing at him at the top of her lungs.
But I regress.
But I regress.
“There, peeping among the cloud-wrack above a dark tor high up in the mountains, Sam saw a white star twinkle for a while. The beauty of it smote his heart, as he looked up out of the forsaken land, and hope returned to him. For like a shaft, clear and cold, the thought pierced him that in the end the Shadow was only a small and passing thing: there was light and high beauty for ever beyond its reach.”
― J.R.R. Tolkien, The Return of the King
― J.R.R. Tolkien, The Return of the King
- Cenedril_Gildinaur
- Posts: 1076
- Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 7:01 pm
Oh come now, do you mean to tell me that you think progressives are more intellectually arrogant than libertarians?Voronwë the Faithful wrote:But the idea that only progressives are rational -- and thus that anyone who is not a progressive and doesn't agree with Krugman are automatically irrational -- is a most toxic concept. And in my experience, it is a common idea among progressives, more so than any other group.
But you make a point. On another forum someone was going on and on about how stupid Republicans are, and I pointed out that his party loses about half the time to those same "stupid" Republicans.
I then pointed out that even if they are less intelligent, you can still lose if you underestimate them, so it pays to not believe your own propaganda about the enemy too much.
He pretended he didn't see my comment.
I've heard both about the bias of reality, and I've heard of conservotards, libtards, and libertopians.nerdanel wrote:If I had a dollar for every time I've heard a conservative acquaintance say, "Reality has a well-known conservative bias," or use words like "libtard," for instance, I'd be rich enough to be the beneficiary of said conservatives' tax policies.
"If you love wealth more than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, depart from us in peace. We ask not your counsel nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you. May your chains rest lightly upon you and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen."
-- Samuel Adams
-- Samuel Adams