The 2008 Presidential Campaign: Part Three

Discussions of and about the historic 2008 U.S. Presidential Election
Locked
User avatar
sauronsfinger
Posts: 3508
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2005 2:25 am

Post by sauronsfinger »

Hal are you trying to infer that Obama was an affirmative action admission? Please just come out and say it.
Friends of Obama have said they recalled him saying that he did not list his race on his Harvard Law School application.

"I have no way of knowing whether I was a beneficiary of affirmative action either in my admission to Harvard or my initial election (as president of the Harvard Law ) Review. If I was, then I certainly am not ashamed of the fact, for I would argue that affirmative action is important precisely because those who benefit typically rise to the challenge when given an opportunity."
that is from UPI.com 8/10/08
There are two novels that can change a bookish fourteen-year old's life: The Lord of the Rings and Atlas Shrugged. One is a childish fantasy that often engenders a lifelong obsession with its unbelievable heroes, leading to an emotionally stunted, socially crippled adulthood, unable to deal with the real world. The other, of course, involves orcs.... John Rogers
nerdanel
This is Rome
Posts: 5963
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 11:48 pm
Location: Concrete Jungle by the Lagoon

Post by nerdanel »

halplm wrote:
River wrote:I imagine he mailed in an application that included his transcripts, his test scores, and his letters of rec. And then he showed he deserved his offer of admission by graduating on time with high honors.
Did he? How do you know that? If it's true, why would he hide his grades? Given he's hiding his grades, isn't it more likely that he got into Harvard by knowing the right people? Oh, and lets not forget he's black, which gives him a leg up on white people. But I'm sure it was just the hard work... of which we have no evidence...
...except his, you know, managing to graduate at the top of his class WHILE being President of the Harvard Law Review (which I heard described during my time at HLS as a full time job on top of coursework.) By the way, exams at HLS are blind-graded, so his professors wouldn't have been able to give him a "leg up on white people" - he actually would have needed to earn his grades.

And - as a cum laude graduate of HLS, who knows how many thousands of hours of blood, sweet and tears were required to earn that lesser designation - I'd stipulate that ANY magna cum laude grad of HLS (whether Republican or Democrat, black or white or Asian or Hispanic, male or female) "deserved" to be at HLS. You, my friend (tm, McCain), have no idea what it takes to get through that school at all - let alone in the fashion that Obama did.

That said, V - one quick clarification - the magna/top 10 percent is a recent innovation at HLS, and I think it post-dated Obama, but would need to check the back of my transcript to be sure. Before, there used to be a minimum GPA cutoff for magna and the designation was usually awarded to a greater percentage of the class (IIRC, 15-25 percent - a sore spot b/c I'd have graduated magna under that standard - gah!)
Last edited by nerdanel on Tue Oct 21, 2008 12:10 am, edited 2 times in total.
I won't just survive
Oh, you will see me thrive
Can't write my story
I'm beyond the archetype
I won't just conform
No matter how you shake my core
'Cause my roots, they run deep, oh

When, when the fire's at my feet again
And the vultures all start circling
They're whispering, "You're out of time,"
But still I rise
This is no mistake, no accident
When you think the final nail is in, think again
Don't be surprised, I will still rise
User avatar
Inanna
Meetu's little sister
Posts: 17680
Joined: Sat Jan 07, 2006 5:03 pm

Post by Inanna »

halplm wrote:
Voronwë_the_Faithful wrote:
halplm wrote:And Obama's grades are not important, the fact he won't release them is... particularly as he has said so emphatically that he worked hard for everything he got... when if his grades were low, it would be obvious that he was helped along at several points. So once again, did he lie, and hide the evidence? Or... um... well, no, I'm pretty sure that's what he did, as there's not really any other reason for hiding your grades. Me, I was pretty proud of mine.
Obama graduated Magna Cum Laude from Harvard Law School, meaning he was in the top ten percent of arguably the hardest, most competitive school of any kind in the country (please don't tell nel I said that ;)).
Sure, but how did he get in?
As far as I know, Harvard, and almost all schools do NOT look at only grades when admitting. They look at the whole "package", blah-blah.... so yes, maybe his cgpa was not 4.0, that would indicate to you that he was helped? Or that it was only affirmative action?

Does it matter? If his grades do show that he was B- in, I don't know, mathematics - that is going to change what the voters think about him as a candidate?
'You just said "your getting shorter": you've obviously been drinking too much ent-draught and not enough Prim's.' - Jude
User avatar
sauronsfinger
Posts: 3508
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2005 2:25 am

Post by sauronsfinger »

latest poll numbers from WashingtonPost.com show no change from last week:
The new survey shows Obama leading McCain by 53 percent to 44 percent among likely voters, little changed from a separate Post-ABC News poll released last Monday. Among all registered voters, Obama's lead is 10 percentage points, 52 percent to 42 percent.
There are two novels that can change a bookish fourteen-year old's life: The Lord of the Rings and Atlas Shrugged. One is a childish fantasy that often engenders a lifelong obsession with its unbelievable heroes, leading to an emotionally stunted, socially crippled adulthood, unable to deal with the real world. The other, of course, involves orcs.... John Rogers
halplm
hooked
Posts: 4864
Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2005 7:15 am

Post by halplm »

no, how did he get IN, Nel.

And, of course, he had to work to graduate from Harvard.

And SF, I'm sure "friends of Obama" would never lie. And did he get in with the help of Affirmative action? Not my point. He probably knew the right people, who knew the right people, who wanted to get his political career off to a great start.

Again, if he got in on merit, why would he hide his grades?
User avatar
River
bioalchemist
Posts: 13427
Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2007 1:08 am
Location: the dry land

Post by River »

What do his undergrad grades matter when he graduated in the top 10% of his law school class? Are your really saying a man who graduated Magna cum Laude didn't deserve to be there? Because people who don't belong in a university program of any kind don't graduate with honors. They get the boot long before that, or crawl over the finish line carrying their limbs. I've seen it happen.

As for the affirmative action bs...I'm not going to start. You're sounding like a bitter white man.

ETA: Why do Obama's grades matter? Or anyone's for that matter?
Last edited by River on Tue Oct 21, 2008 12:15 am, edited 1 time in total.
When you can do nothing what can you do?
Erunáme
Posts: 2364
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 11:54 pm
Contact:

Post by Erunáme »

hal, when you go to Obama's website to donate you have to check a box testifying all of this:
1. I am a United States citizen or a lawfully-admitted permanent resident.
2. I am at least 16 years old.
3. This contribution is not made from the general treasury funds of a corporation, labor organization or national bank.
4. This contribution is not made from the funds of a political action committee.
5. This contribution is not made from the treasury of an entity or person who is a federal contractor.
6. This contribution is not made from the funds of an individual registered as a federal lobbyist or a foreign agent, or an entity that is a federally registered lobbying firm or foreign agent.
7. The funds I am donating are not being provided to me by another person or entity for the purpose of making this contribution.
I would assume the same things are verified by phone. Could people lie? Yes, but how is Obama's campaign supposed to stop them from doing that?
Ellienor wrote:Hal, when you post without using words like Lie and Hate, I enjoy having you here.
Add phrases like "You are so blinded", "you don't care about...", "you want to see him win at all costs", "you can't accept" and "it sickens me to see him able to trick smart people into buying his rhetoric".

Hal, when will you learn that people not agreeing with you does not mean that your opinion is unwanted? How many people have to say this to you?
Last edited by Erunáme on Tue Oct 21, 2008 12:15 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Primula Baggins
Living in hope
Posts: 40005
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 1:43 am
Location: Sailing the luminiferous aether
Contact:

Post by Primula Baggins »

Do you know of any evidence that he didn't deserve his admission to Harvard Law?

Do you know of any evidence that 1% of his donations are illegal ones from overseas?

Do you know of any evidence that any of the things you hint at and insinuate are true?

In the absence of any evidence of wrongdoing, no American has to prove his innocence to anyone, including you, Hal. (In fact, even if there were evidence, it would still be up to the state to prove guilt.) There is effectively a higher standard for presidential candidates in that they get scrutinized from all angles by whole teams of experts, some of whom are extremely eager to find anything disqualifying. You hint that no one has looked hard enough at Obama; I counter that mobs of really skilled and suspicious people have done just that, for two years now, and anything they found that was headline-worthy would already be headlines.
“There, peeping among the cloud-wrack above a dark tor high up in the mountains, Sam saw a white star twinkle for a while. The beauty of it smote his heart, as he looked up out of the forsaken land, and hope returned to him. For like a shaft, clear and cold, the thought pierced him that in the end the Shadow was only a small and passing thing: there was light and high beauty for ever beyond its reach.”
― J.R.R. Tolkien, The Return of the King
halplm
hooked
Posts: 4864
Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2005 7:15 am

Post by halplm »

Mahima wrote:
halplm wrote:
Voronwë_the_Faithful wrote: Obama graduated Magna Cum Laude from Harvard Law School, meaning he was in the top ten percent of arguably the hardest, most competitive school of any kind in the country (please don't tell nel I said that ;)).
Sure, but how did he get in?
As far as I know, Harvard, and almost all schools do NOT look at only grades when admitting. They look at the whole "package", blah-blah.... so yes, maybe his cgpa was not 4.0, that would indicate to you that he was helped? Or that it was only affirmative action?

Does it matter? If his grades do show that he was B- in, I don't know, mathematics - that is going to change what the voters think about him as a candidate?
Again, not my point. He has stated repeatedly that he "worked hard" and got where he was without any help... but if it then comes out that someone greased the wheels for him to even get into Harvard. If his political career was starting there, it's yet another peice of mystery about how he got to where he is so quickly.

Again, he could settle everything by talking about it and releasing his grades... but he doesn't, and wont. Why?
User avatar
River
bioalchemist
Posts: 13427
Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2007 1:08 am
Location: the dry land

Post by River »

nel, this is just a point of curiousity. At my undergrad institution, the latin honors cut-offs were set by GPA. One deviation above the mean was cum laude, two out magna, three out summa. Harvard was more generous?
When you can do nothing what can you do?
halplm
hooked
Posts: 4864
Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2005 7:15 am

Post by halplm »

Primula Baggins wrote:Do you know of any evidence that he didn't deserve his admission to Harvard Law?

Do you know of any evidence that 1% of his donations are illegal ones from overseas?

Do you know of any evidence that any of the things you hint at and insinuate are true?

In the absence of any evidence of wrongdoing, no American has to prove his innocence to anyone, including you, Hal. (In fact, even if there were evidence, it would still be up to the state to prove guilt.) There is effectively a higher standard for presidential candidates in that they get scrutinized from all angles by whole teams of experts, some of whom are extremely eager to find anything disqualifying. You hint that no one has looked hard enough at Obama; I counter that mobs of really skilled and suspicious people have done just that, for two years now, and anything they found that was headline-worthy would already be headlines.
No, but I see a whole lot of stuff he doesn't want to talk about... and he's written two books about himself.

He talks about stuff that people used to hide, drugs and such, but those are safe things to talk about for politicians these days.

He hides things. He's afraid of people digging into his past, which he has very very carefully hidden (or as you say, people would find it).

Do I think this is because he's an evil man? No.

I think it is because he has been runnign for president for 20 years, and he has had people helping him that I do think are evil men, and he has been able to get where he is too quickly with not enough scrutiny, and it baffles me.

And this has nothing to do with evidence such as the law requires to prove guilt or innocence. The fact you guys keep bringing that up is just deflecting from the issue.

This has to do with people's VOTES. It has to do with people's PERCEPTIONS based upon which they choose to VOTE. Someone can completely lie about everything, and if they are convincing enough, get everyone to vote for them. It has nothing to do with truth. It has to do with acting and salesmanship.


Why on earth is it wrong for me to want to know how he got into Harvard? I know damn well personally how hard it is to get into Harvard, and I worked my guts out with nothing to show for it. He better darn well have had a 4.0 with a million other extra reasons to get in, or he damn well didn't work hard enough to get in.

Why is it wrong for me to want to know how he could sit in a church with a sick man like Rev. Wright for 20 years?

Why is it wrong for me to want to know why he can even go to a terrorist's house, much less spend 50 million dollars with him and accomplish nothing?

This guy could be president of the United states. Every business deal he's ever done should be public. Every financial deal. Every grade he ever got. Every paper he ever wrote and everything he couldn't get published should be available to me so that I can decide how to cast my vote.

The fact that he would hide ANY of it scares me to death. And the fact that people could so blindly follow him scares me even more.
User avatar
TheEllipticalDisillusion
Insolent Pup
Posts: 550
Joined: Wed Apr 26, 2006 5:26 am

Post by TheEllipticalDisillusion »

hal wrote:Again, not my point. He has stated repeatedly that he "worked hard" and got where he was without any help... but if it then comes out that someone greased the wheels for him to even get into Harvard. If his political career was starting there, it's yet another peice of mystery about how he got to where he is so quickly
But do you have evidenced that the wheels were greased?

How do you know McCain spent all that time in the POW camp? What if someone lied? This is just a counter-example.
hal wrote:Again, he could settle everything by talking about it and releasing his grades... but he doesn't, and wont. Why?
Because the accusation isn't valid. Obama doesn't have to prove that your baseless accusation is a lie, you have to prove that your accusation is truth. You is generic. It is the same thing with Obama's citizenship.

Question: why is Wright sick?
halplm
hooked
Posts: 4864
Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2005 7:15 am

Post by halplm »

TheEllipticalDisillusion wrote:
Question: why is Wright sick?
Well, for starters, he's a racist.
ToshoftheWuffingas
Posts: 1579
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2005 3:34 pm

Post by ToshoftheWuffingas »

Ah, I think I get it now. A black man couldn't have the talent to achieve entrance and success at Harvard. There must have been evil men secretly in the background giving him a leg up.
Right.
<a><img></a>
halplm
hooked
Posts: 4864
Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2005 7:15 am

Post by halplm »

Ooh, It only took the next post to call ME a racist. I didn't even think it would be that fast.
Erunáme
Posts: 2364
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 11:54 pm
Contact:

Post by Erunáme »

halplm wrote:He hides things. He's afraid of people digging into his past, which he has very very carefully hidden (or as you say, people would find it).

<snip>

This has to do with people's VOTES. It has to do with people's PERCEPTIONS based upon which they choose to VOTE. Someone can completely lie about everything, and if they are convincing enough, get everyone to vote for them. It has nothing to do with truth. It has to do with acting and salesmanship.


Why on earth is it wrong for me to want to know how he got into Harvard? I know damn well personally how hard it is to get into Harvard, and I worked my guts out with nothing to show for it. He better darn well have had a 4.0 with a million other extra reasons to get in, or he damn well didn't work hard enough to get in.

Why is it wrong for me to want to know how he could sit in a church with a sick man like Rev. Wright for 20 years?

Why is it wrong for me to want to know why he can even go to a terrorist's house, much less spend 50 million dollars with him and accomplish nothing?

This guy could be president of the United states. Every business deal he's ever done should be public. Every financial deal. Every grade he ever got. Every paper he ever wrote and everything he couldn't get published should be available to me so that I can decide how to cast my vote.

The fact that he would hide ANY of it scares me to death. And the fact that people could so blindly follow him scares me even more.
All this from someone who supports Palin? I'm sorry but it strikes me as ironic.
halplm
hooked
Posts: 4864
Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2005 7:15 am

Post by halplm »

HA, as if Palin could hide anythign, with the scrutiny she's had.

I guess you have specifics that make me seem hypocritical, but you'll have to point them.
Erunáme
Posts: 2364
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 11:54 pm
Contact:

Post by Erunáme »

halplm wrote:Ooh, It only took the next post to call ME a racist. I didn't even think it would be that fast.
*tries to find where anyone called hal a racist. Can only find hal calling calling someone else a racist. Is perplexed*
halplm
hooked
Posts: 4864
Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2005 7:15 am

Post by halplm »

ToshoftheWuffingas wrote:Ah, I think I get it now. A black man couldn't have the talent to achieve entrance and success at Harvard. There must have been evil men secretly in the background giving him a leg up.
Right.
Erunáme
Posts: 2364
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 11:54 pm
Contact:

Post by Erunáme »

halplm wrote:HA, as if Palin could hide anythign, with the scrutiny she's had.
And Obama didn't have the same scrutiny? I mean, come on, he ran against Hillary!
I guess you have specifics that make me seem hypocritical, but you'll have to point them.
I've already made comments in the past about how to go to lengths to explain away unsavoury issues regarding Palin. You seem to brush off things like Troopergate or the Bridge to Nowhere, but you make a HUGE deal out of the smallest issues in regards to Obama.

edit: I'm still failing to see where anyone called you a racist. Seems you're reading into things that aren't there.
Locked