It is currently Mon Oct 22, 2018 11:17 pm

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 158 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 8  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 29, 2009 2:18 pm 
Offline
Feeling grateful
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 12:41 am
Posts: 33818
Another review at Amazon, this one only three stars. But well-argued overall, I thought; in fact, though it doesn't appear to be, this review could easily have been written by our friend Aelfwine (which I mean as a compliment).

_________________
'But very bright were the stars upon the margin of the world, when at times the clouds about the West were drawn aside.'


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Aug 09, 2009 5:04 am 
Offline
Feeling grateful
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 12:41 am
Posts: 33818
Charles Noad, author of the essay "On the Construction of The Silmarillion from the book Tolkien's Legendarium and a longtime expert on Tolkien's work (particularly The Silmarillion), who proofread much of HoMe, has reviewed Arda Reconstructed, along with Elizabeth Whittingham's The Evolution of Tolkien's Mythology and Dimitra Fimi's Tolkien, Race, and Cultural History
at the LOTR Plaza:

Three Tolkien Book Reviews - Charles Noad

The review of my book is the last (and by far the longest). He has both praise and criticism for it, not surprisingly. Overall I think it is a good review.

I have made a brief response to clarify a couple of points:

http://www.lotrplaza.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=234549&PID=7077453#7077453

_________________
'But very bright were the stars upon the margin of the world, when at times the clouds about the West were drawn aside.'


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 11, 2009 3:43 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat May 26, 2007 12:41 am
Posts: 495
Location: Cleveland, OH, USA
Voronwë_the_Faithful wrote:
Charles Noad, author of the essay "On the Construction of The Silmarillion"... He has both praise and criticism for it, not surprisingly. Overall I think it is a good review.

I was most struck by this comment by Noad:

Quote:
The 1977 version became a work of lesser importance, a somewhat secondary and, to a degree, synthetic assemblage. In fact it’s a long time since I’ve read it.


About sixteen months ago, a professor attending the annual Tolkien conference at the University of Vermont said the same thing when I mentioned Voronwë's book, then still being prepared by the publisher: he never read The Silmarillion anymore, as he preferred The History of Middle-earth texts.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 11, 2009 5:10 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2008 8:44 pm
Posts: 5
Location: Dallas, TX
N.E. Brigand wrote:
I was most struck by this comment by Noad:

Quote:
The 1977 version became a work of lesser importance, a somewhat secondary and, to a degree, synthetic assemblage. In fact it’s a long time since I’ve read it.


About sixteen months ago, a professor attending the annual Tolkien conference at the University of Vermont said the same thing when I mentioned Voronwë's book, then still being prepared by the publisher: he never read The Silmarillion anymore, as he preferred The History of Middle-earth texts.


It's already a minority of Tolkien fans who bother with The Silmarillion at all; but among even the more serious fans, I have to think it's a very, very small segment who prefer The History of Middle-earth to The Silmarillion, especially to the extent of no longer reading the latter. Don't you think?

_________________
Jason Fisher
http://lingwe.blogspot.com/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 12, 2009 1:39 am 
Offline
Feeling grateful
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 12:41 am
Posts: 33818
I don't know if that is true or now, vw. What I do think is objectively establishable is that The Silmarillion has had, and will continue to have, a much, much higher readership than The History of Middle-earth, which is primarily for scholars and, dare I say, fanatics. Which is why it is so disappointing to me that so much of the material that Mr. Noad (correctly, in my opinion) identified as being "necessary for attaining any real understanding" of Tolkien's world was not included in the published book, therefore leaving the vast majority of his readers unexposed to it.

_________________
'But very bright were the stars upon the margin of the world, when at times the clouds about the West were drawn aside.'


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 13, 2009 1:12 am 
Offline
Feeling grateful
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 12:41 am
Posts: 33818
A couple of months ago I mentioned in this thread that there was a review of Arda Reconstructed in the May issue of the Tolkien journal Beyond Bree, written by Nancy Martsch, editor of the journal. To my surprise, there is another review of the book in the August issue of Beyond Bree, written by none other than Christina Scull, co-author of the Lord of the Rings Reader's Companion and the J.R.R. Tolkien Companion and Guide, with contributions by Wayne G. Hammond (her husband and co-author on both of those essential books).

However, the piece entitled "Reflections on The Silmarillion and Arda Reconstructed" isn't so much an objective review of my book as much as a passionate defense of Christopher Tolkien's work on The Silmarillion. As such, I feel that it gives an overly negative impression of how critical my book is of Christopher's work. There are a number of places where her comments give a downright misleading impression of what I say. I'm not going to give a litany of all of them; I'm just going to give one representative sample.

Ms. Scull wrote:
To add to the confusion, in his final years Tolkien envisaged massive alteration to his legendarium, in cosmology and other matters, but made few of the necessary changes. He was uncertain how to introduce them and still preserve elements particularly dear to him, such as the significance of the Two Trees and the Elves waking under the stars. Kane should understand that the inclusion of some of the texts whose omission he regrets would have introduced inconsistencies unless other parts were rewritten.


Someone who has not read my book would probably assume from that statement that I criticize Christopher for not attempting to incorporate the changes that Tolkien envisioned to his cosmology and related matters. The truth is just the opposite. I actually praise Christopher in several places for not doing so and I specifically state that losing such things as the Elves waking under the stars would outweigh any benefit to making the change and that I am grateful that Christopher did not attempt to do so (see, e.g., Arda Reconstructed, p. 123.)

There are a number of other places in the piece in which Ms. Scull seems to imply that I criticize Christopher for not incorporating Tolkien's late writings into The Silmarillion. This simply is not the case. She also gives the impression (whether intentionally or not I can't say) that I express the wish that Christopher had pursued a 'complex', 'academic option'." Again, just the opposite is true; I expressly state that I thought that he did the correct thing in constructing a single text from different sources.

I have the utmost respect for Ms. Scull's work. Those who follow the LOTR discussions here (as well as the discussion on the Tale of Aragorn and Arwen that I led at TORN) will know that I repeatedly cite her and Mr. Hammond's LOTR Reader's Guide. At another forum, I stated just a couple of weeks ago regarding the LOTR Readers Guide and the J.R.R. Companion and Guide "I literally could not imagine not owning either of them. They are that valuable." (see here.) And there is certainly much interesting information and ideas in this piece. I just wish that Ms. Scull had been a bit more careful at the impressions she leaves of what I wrote. It is quite surprising from someone who is usually so precise in what she says.

_________________
'But very bright were the stars upon the margin of the world, when at times the clouds about the West were drawn aside.'


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 02, 2009 11:25 pm 
Offline
Feeling grateful
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 12:41 am
Posts: 33818
This isn't really a "review" per se, but it was too amusing not to post about. I found this little blurb at a place called "SciTech Book News, Inc.":

Quote:
Arda reconstructed; the creation of the published Silmarillion.
Kane, Douglas Charles.
Lehigh University Press, ©2009 280 p. $65.00 PR6039978-0-9801496-3-0
By day a mild-mannered employment attorney in balmy California, by night Kane is a resident and ferocious defender of Middle Earth, also a scholar of its origins and development. Here he details the long and winding road by which Christopher Tolkien assembled and published the extension to his father's classic fantasy series, and argues that the Silmarillion provides a fuller account of the original vision than Lord of the Rings does. In particular, he details where in the multitude of manuscripts and fragments that various passages and constructions were found, and how they were reconstructed and dovetailed into a final narrative. Distributed in the US by Associated University Presses. (Annotation ©2009 Book News Inc. Portland, OR)


I'd really like to know who actually wrote that blurb! It's very cool.

http://www.booknews.com/ref_issues/ref_aug2009/asup1.html

_________________
'But very bright were the stars upon the margin of the world, when at times the clouds about the West were drawn aside.'


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 02, 2009 11:36 pm 
Offline
Living in hope
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 12:43 am
Posts: 39536
Location: Sailing the luminiferous aether
It's startlingly accurate, right down to "mild-mannered" and "ferocious." Who do you know in Portland?

_________________
“There, peeping among the cloud-wrack above a dark tor high up in the mountains, Sam saw a white star twinkle for a while. The beauty of it smote his heart, as he looked up out of the forsaken land, and hope returned to him. For like a shaft, clear and cold, the thought pierced him that in the end the Shadow was only a small and passing thing: there was light and high beauty for ever beyond its reach.”
― J.R.R. Tolkien, The Return of the King


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 02, 2009 11:42 pm 
Offline
Feeling grateful
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 12:41 am
Posts: 33818
No one that I can think of, although I can certainly think of someone in Oregon that could have written that.

_________________
'But very bright were the stars upon the margin of the world, when at times the clouds about the West were drawn aside.'


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 02, 2009 11:45 pm 
Offline
Living in hope
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 12:43 am
Posts: 39536
Location: Sailing the luminiferous aether
:P

But didn't.

Though I would've if I could've.

_________________
“There, peeping among the cloud-wrack above a dark tor high up in the mountains, Sam saw a white star twinkle for a while. The beauty of it smote his heart, as he looked up out of the forsaken land, and hope returned to him. For like a shaft, clear and cold, the thought pierced him that in the end the Shadow was only a small and passing thing: there was light and high beauty for ever beyond its reach.”
― J.R.R. Tolkien, The Return of the King


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 11, 2010 11:14 pm 
Offline
Feeling grateful
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 12:41 am
Posts: 33818
Not exactly a review, but from the last paragraph of the entry on The History of Middle-earth in The Literary Encyclopedia (the entry was written by Jason Fisher, who reviewed Arda Reconstructed for Mythlore):

Quote:
More recently, scholars have begun to delve deeper into The History of Middle earth. Beyond the more obvious use of the series as a quarry for raw material, and beyond even the assessment of its various component parts as artistic works in themselves, the series makes possible the exploration of new questions, such as whether and to what extent Tolkien’s mythological and cosmological stories evolved or ossified over the course of his life. This is the question Elizabeth Whittingham takes up in her book, The Evolution of Tolkien’s Mythology: A Study of The History of Middle-earth (2007). And much more significantly, since much of the raw material has now been revealed, exactly what role did Christopher Tolkien play in the construction of The Silmarillion as published in 1977? For approaches to this second question, see Anne Petty’s “Identifying England’s Lönnrot”, Jason Fisher’s “From Mythopoeia to Mythography: Tolkien, Lönnrot, and Jerome”, and especially Douglas Kane’s Arda Reconstructed: The Creation of the Published Silmarillion . The latter is probably the most extensive analysis of The History of Middle-earth so far undertaken; it is essentially a paragraph by paragraph comparison of the published Silmarillion with the source writings Christopher Tolkien made available in the twelve-volume series.

_________________
'But very bright were the stars upon the margin of the world, when at times the clouds about the West were drawn aside.'


Last edited by Voronwë the Faithful on Thu Feb 11, 2010 11:48 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 11, 2010 11:22 pm 
Offline
Living in hope
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 12:43 am
Posts: 39536
Location: Sailing the luminiferous aether
That "especially" is especially nice. :)

And in the entry on HoMe!

_________________
“There, peeping among the cloud-wrack above a dark tor high up in the mountains, Sam saw a white star twinkle for a while. The beauty of it smote his heart, as he looked up out of the forsaken land, and hope returned to him. For like a shaft, clear and cold, the thought pierced him that in the end the Shadow was only a small and passing thing: there was light and high beauty for ever beyond its reach.”
― J.R.R. Tolkien, The Return of the King


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 11, 2010 11:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2005 5:02 am
Posts: 3640
Nice! :)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 11, 2010 11:40 pm 
Offline
2018 Fitbit Balrog*
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 07, 2006 4:03 pm
Posts: 11445
Very nice. :)

_________________
*title copyright: Teremia

'You just said "your getting shorter": you've obviously been drinking too much ent-draught and not enough Prim's.' - Jude (as Merry)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 12, 2010 4:03 pm 
Offline
Feeling grateful
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 12:41 am
Posts: 33818
Also not a review, but worth noting. I received a notice from Google Alerts about a woman in Russia who listed her "Results of the Year 2009" and listed Arda Reconstructed as her "Book of the Year."

link

That's kinda cool. 8)

_________________
'But very bright were the stars upon the margin of the world, when at times the clouds about the West were drawn aside.'


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 12, 2010 4:09 pm 
Offline
Lali Beag Bídeach
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 16, 2005 4:42 pm
Posts: 13550
Location: Rivendell
Those are both very cool! 8)

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Feb 27, 2010 7:27 pm 
Offline
Feeling grateful
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 12:41 am
Posts: 33818
Another mention of the book by Christina Scull in a blog post called "Christina Reads (2009)" at her and Wayne Hammond's blog:

Quote:
Douglas Charles Kane’s Arda Reconstructed: The Creation of the Published Silmarillion (2009), a study of which of his father’s text texts Christopher Tolkien used in The Silmarillion, is a significant piece of research that I wish had been presented differently, as I wrote in an article which appeared in the August 2009 Beyond Bree.


http://wayneandchristina.wordpress.com/2010/02/27/christina-reads-2009/

_________________
'But very bright were the stars upon the margin of the world, when at times the clouds about the West were drawn aside.'


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 29, 2010 2:46 pm 
Offline
Feeling grateful
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 12:41 am
Posts: 33818
Another "not exactly a review" (and this one also "not in English"), but the Polish online magazine Ancalina has a long interview with me (done in English, but tranlated into Polish), along with translations into Polish of the reviews/essays that were in Beyond Bree about Arda Reconstructed, by Nancy Martsch and Christina Scull, and the responses to Christina's essay that were subsequently printed.

http://bezkr.es/bt/ancalima/

_________________
'But very bright were the stars upon the margin of the world, when at times the clouds about the West were drawn aside.'


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 29, 2010 2:48 pm 
Offline
Living in hope
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 12:43 am
Posts: 39536
Location: Sailing the luminiferous aether
That's really cool, Voronwë! 8)

_________________
“There, peeping among the cloud-wrack above a dark tor high up in the mountains, Sam saw a white star twinkle for a while. The beauty of it smote his heart, as he looked up out of the forsaken land, and hope returned to him. For like a shaft, clear and cold, the thought pierced him that in the end the Shadow was only a small and passing thing: there was light and high beauty for ever beyond its reach.”
― J.R.R. Tolkien, The Return of the King


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 29, 2010 2:51 pm 
Offline
Feeling grateful
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 12:41 am
Posts: 33818
It looks like a really cool magazine. It makes me want to learn Polish just so that I could read it (and not just my interview).

_________________
'But very bright were the stars upon the margin of the world, when at times the clouds about the West were drawn aside.'


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 158 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 8  Next

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group