As V-man says, I think DoS suffered primarily from AUJ's poor critical reception (and possibly, from the beginnings of Middle Earth fatigue...).Elentári wrote:Surely the reverse is more likely? Could one not look at these figures and say that DoS has made less money the further away it got from Tolkien and the closer PJ tried to squeeze it into the "Blockbuster" mould? If DoS had been the most successful, WB would have felt the changes more vindicated...Passdagas the Brown wrote:Still a pretty impressive number.
I actually want this to make as much money as possible. IMO, the more financially successful it is, the less pressure the WB people will put on PJ to include elements of standard blockbusterism. That theory sits on a shaky empirical foundation, but it feels right to me!
Plus, I don't think DoS fits the "Blockbuster" mould very well. It's a very strange film (IMO, it has a fever dream quality), and I've never seen another blockbuster like it.