It is currently Wed Dec 13, 2017 7:21 am

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 685 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Nov 23, 2014 2:47 pm 
Offline
Feeling grateful
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 12:41 am
Posts: 32720
Why do they put the best music after the movie is over? That's twice in a row.

_________________
Woods is most felt. Nice! it's gentle on your mind.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Nov 23, 2014 3:07 pm 
Offline
Wrong within normal parameters
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2006 9:59 am
Posts: 4220
Location: The other side of Michigan
Elentári wrote:
Glorious 'pipes and some Dwarven vocals! Does sound like it might be a credits 'suite' of themes, though...


Yup. #1 is presumably Ironfoot. #2 is something new, but pretty clearly dwarven. #3 is a new take on "The line of Girion," which I think we can call "King Bard" (it also shows up in the sampler for Shores of the Long Lake). And the last one sounds related to Tauriel's theme (maybe), though it has changed.

Anyway, I reiterate what I said earlier about this score having an "Old Testament" feel to it.

Dave_LF wrote:
Anyway, in the Sons of Durin clip, starting around 0:50 and continuing basically to the end of the sample, there is a sequence that strongly resembles a brassier version of the one that plays behind Théoden's pep talk on the Pelennor (The Fields of Pelennor, also at 0:50 oddly enough).


I was off-base with this. That melody does play behind the last charge of the Rohirrim (both of them, in fact), but that's always been one of those odd chinks in the motif suite, because this is the "rage" version of the nature theme--used for the ents and the moth. And the eagles. And I'm sure that's what it is here.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Nov 23, 2014 7:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 5:03 pm
Posts: 5199
Location: Green Hill Country
This is interesting...in a concert recently, Neil Finn performed a new song that he had submitted for BotFA...

Quote:
Among the classics were some special moments like his new song There and Back Again, written for the final Hobbit movie but failing to make the final cut in Peter Jackson's film, according to Finn.


https://au.news.yahoo.com/thewest/entertainment/a/25589926/musical-trio-mesmerise/

_________________
There is magic in long-distance friendships. They let you relate to other human beings in a way that goes beyond being physically together and is often more profound.
~Diana Cortes


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Nov 23, 2014 9:43 pm 
Offline
Feeling grateful
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 12:41 am
Posts: 32720
Since his song for AUJ was by far my least favorite of the songs in the M-e films, I am not disappointed by this news at all.

_________________
Woods is most felt. Nice! it's gentle on your mind.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Nov 23, 2014 9:47 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2013 8:31 pm
Posts: 3154
Should you not reserve judgment until you hear the song? ;)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Nov 23, 2014 9:49 pm 
Offline
Feeling grateful
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 12:41 am
Posts: 32720
No, since I probably will never hear the song, seeing as that it is not in the film, and I have little or no interest in Neil Finn.

But nice try! :clap:

_________________
Woods is most felt. Nice! it's gentle on your mind.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Nov 23, 2014 9:52 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2013 8:31 pm
Posts: 3154
In that case, perhaps you shouldn't judge it at all?

I mean, just because I don't like Peter Jackson films very much, and just because I feel his films are riddled with nonsense, it doesn't follow that a scene that sounds stupid when described by an eyewitness, is necessarily stupid. I will have to see it to make a judgment. And if I don't see the film, I will make no judgment at all!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Nov 23, 2014 10:10 pm 
Offline
Feeling grateful
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 12:41 am
Posts: 32720
Nor am I judging it. I am simply expressing my own lack of disappointment that I won't have an opportunity to judge it, since I don't seek out works by artists that I don't particularly appreciate, like Neil Finn, or certain directors whose works are not to my taste, like Cuaron or Malick.

_________________
Woods is most felt. Nice! it's gentle on your mind.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Nov 23, 2014 10:15 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2013 8:31 pm
Posts: 3154
But I would argue that you should only be "not disappointed by this news at all" if you have actually heard the song, and known for sure that you dislike it. Who knows? You may love it, and it might blow Billy Boyd's tune out of the water!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Nov 23, 2014 10:57 pm 
Offline
Feeling grateful
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 12:41 am
Posts: 32720
Maybe, but I doubt that it would be to my taste, regardless of how good it is. That is a significant difference between you and me. I am much more likely to conclude that something is not to my taste, rather than that it is "bad". I don't think that "Children of Men" or "Tree of Life" are bad, just not to my taste. "John Carter," on the other hand, is just plain bad (whether judged as a film or as an adaptation).

_________________
Woods is most felt. Nice! it's gentle on your mind.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 24, 2014 1:13 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2013 8:31 pm
Posts: 3154
That's not a difference at all. You're confusing semantics with substance. When I say something is "bad," I mean that it is "bad" according to my tastes. There can be no other interpretation of my position other than that, because art is entirely subjective. IMO. :)

In that sense, we are exactly the same.

:gladhug:


Last edited by Passdagas the Brown on Mon Nov 24, 2014 1:57 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 24, 2014 1:31 am 
Offline
Feeling grateful
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 12:41 am
Posts: 32720
But if there is one thing that we have learned from Tolkien, words matter. Even if the substance is the same, I firmly believe that the message that is transmitted it different.

_________________
Woods is most felt. Nice! it's gentle on your mind.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 24, 2014 1:44 am 
Offline
not something I would recommend
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 07, 2005 11:13 pm
Posts: 12883
Location: Florida
Voronwë the Faithful wrote:
I don't think that "Children of Men"



You watched "Children of Men"?

_________________
everything happens so much

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 24, 2014 1:46 am 
Offline
Feeling grateful
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 12:41 am
Posts: 32720
Yup.

_________________
Woods is most felt. Nice! it's gentle on your mind.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 24, 2014 2:01 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2013 8:31 pm
Posts: 3154
Voronwë the Faithful wrote:
But if there is one thing that we have learned from Tolkien, words matter. Even if the substance is the same, I firmly believe that the message that is transmitted it different.


Agreed. Though there's a very simple explanation. I occasionally get lazy, and don't write "IMO" or "to my taste." But I'll try to maintain the standard going forward!

To be honest, I don't think anyone can ever make a sound argument for why a piece of art is objectively bad. Even John Carter of Mars, or the legions of, IMO, crappy straight-to-DVD movies. They just don't meet a lot of critical criteria, and that's that. There is really no such thing as art being objectively "bad." I don't believe that, and you don't believe that. So we're on the same page.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 24, 2014 2:02 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2013 8:31 pm
Posts: 3154
yovargas wrote:
You watched "Children of Men"?


Voronwë the Faithful wrote:
Yup.


Spoiler: show
What did you think of the long shot of the baby being escorted off the battle field?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 24, 2014 2:20 am 
Offline
Feeling grateful
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 12:41 am
Posts: 32720
This isn't the place to discuss Children of Men, but I will say that my only real impression of the film is that I found it so relentlessly dreary and depressing that the themes of hope and faith overcoming all failed to make much impression on me.

_________________
Woods is most felt. Nice! it's gentle on your mind.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 24, 2014 2:23 am 
Offline
Feeling grateful
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 12:41 am
Posts: 32720
Passdagas the Brown wrote:
Voronwë the Faithful wrote:
But if there is one thing that we have learned from Tolkien, words matter. Even if the substance is the same, I firmly believe that the message that is transmitted it different.


Agreed. Though there's a very simple explanation. I occasionally get lazy, and don't write "IMO" or "to my taste." But I'll try to maintain the standard going forward!.


To be clear, I don't think adding "IMO" makes that much difference, when it is clear that the opinion that you are expressing is that the film/song/picture/etc. is objectively bad, rather than that it is something that is not to your taste.

_________________
Woods is most felt. Nice! it's gentle on your mind.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 24, 2014 2:41 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2013 8:31 pm
Posts: 3154
That cannot be "clear," as I don't believe it. About any art. As I said, art cannot be objectively good or bad. If that's how you interpret my comments, I will be sure to make my points clearer in the future.

As to Children of Men, the ending alone makes a strong point about hope (and life) overcoming despair (and lifelessness).

Spoiler: show
The implication is that they deliver the baby to the ship, and life continues. Subtle, perhaps, amid so much dreariness. But IMO, very Tolkienian and "eucatastrophic." Amid such barrenness and despair - when all hope seems foolish - a child is born, carried through horror, and delivered to the faithful (who have not forgotten what it means to be human). Frankly, for me, it's more Tolkienian than almost anything in PJ's films, barring the scenes on Mt. Doom, which I think PJ got just right, and a few other moments of sheer cinematic wonder, which I'll actually always be grateful to PJ for.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 24, 2014 2:53 am 
Offline
Feeling grateful
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 12:41 am
Posts: 32720
I don't think it is all that subtle; it is pretty clear that that is what is attempted to be expressed, at least to me (although of course having heard about the film before seeing it certainly may have influenced how obvious it seemed to me). It just didn't work for me. I think it probably is a very good film. Just not to my taste.

_________________
Woods is most felt. Nice! it's gentle on your mind.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 685 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35  Next

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group