Pride and Prejudice: Adaptations of Austen
- truehobbit
- Cute, cuddly and dangerous to know
- Posts: 6019
- Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 2:52 am
- Contact:
- Impenitent
- Throw me a rope.
- Posts: 7260
- Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2005 12:13 am
- Location: Deep in Oz
Well, I'm loving it!
It's amazing how quickly she has established an intimacy with the characters for the reader. I feel as if I've been a part of that circle and have been chatting with these people all my life.
I realized I was surprised at the lack of descriptive text. I suppose I expected rapturous passages describing the beautiful English countryside (don't know why), but there hasn't been a single thing described, not even the characters (except for vague terms like handsome). It is entirely interior, and almost all dialogue! (Perhaps Ms. Austen wasn't paid by the word, as I've heard say Mr. Dickens was).
Mr. Bennet seems disdainful of his wife, and she is too dull to even know when he is insulting her. I was thinking that a marriage like this in our day and age would have ended in divorce; but my understanding of those times was that people's circles were limited, and I suppose if you met someone you could halfway tolerate the practical exigencies compelled people to marry. How awful to have to be married to someone you didn't respect, though.
I must say, I really felt for Mary here:
I thought it was really interesting and revealing that Elizabeth was able to enjoy telling people how Darcy rejected her. I think a less secure person would blush in embarrassment to recall such an incident, much less enjoy relating the story to others, so I found that very telling indeed. She is clearly a very self-confident person (in part because her father favored her, I wonder?).
I'm very eager to get on! I shall now go back and read what Alatar had to say.
It's amazing how quickly she has established an intimacy with the characters for the reader. I feel as if I've been a part of that circle and have been chatting with these people all my life.
I realized I was surprised at the lack of descriptive text. I suppose I expected rapturous passages describing the beautiful English countryside (don't know why), but there hasn't been a single thing described, not even the characters (except for vague terms like handsome). It is entirely interior, and almost all dialogue! (Perhaps Ms. Austen wasn't paid by the word, as I've heard say Mr. Dickens was).
Mr. Bennet seems disdainful of his wife, and she is too dull to even know when he is insulting her. I was thinking that a marriage like this in our day and age would have ended in divorce; but my understanding of those times was that people's circles were limited, and I suppose if you met someone you could halfway tolerate the practical exigencies compelled people to marry. How awful to have to be married to someone you didn't respect, though.
I must say, I really felt for Mary here:
I sort of feel like that here, among people of such exceptional wit and intelligence! I think Whistler would certainly give Mr. Bennett a run for his money in the humour department. Though Mr. Bennett does have an edge of cruelty about him that I do not find attractive.Chapter Two wrote:'What say you, Mary? for you are a young lady of deep reflection, I know, and read great books, and make extracts.'
Mary wished to say something very sensible, but knew not how.
'While Mary is adjusting her ideas,' he continued, 'let us return to Mr. Bingley.'
I thought it was really interesting and revealing that Elizabeth was able to enjoy telling people how Darcy rejected her. I think a less secure person would blush in embarrassment to recall such an incident, much less enjoy relating the story to others, so I found that very telling indeed. She is clearly a very self-confident person (in part because her father favored her, I wonder?).
I'm very eager to get on! I shall now go back and read what Alatar had to say.
- truehobbit
- Cute, cuddly and dangerous to know
- Posts: 6019
- Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 2:52 am
- Contact:
- truehobbit
- Cute, cuddly and dangerous to know
- Posts: 6019
- Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 2:52 am
- Contact:
Ok, sorry, I had overlooked that Padme was a first time reader as well!
(But maybe it wouldn't be saying too much if I just said that Alatar could have some of his questions about the order of the daughters answered, if he looked at the first paragraph of chapter 2 again more closely, as well as at the very end of the same chapter, and at the middle of the third next, where Darcy is being rude - which leaves only two daughters unaccounted for! )
(But maybe it wouldn't be saying too much if I just said that Alatar could have some of his questions about the order of the daughters answered, if he looked at the first paragraph of chapter 2 again more closely, as well as at the very end of the same chapter, and at the middle of the third next, where Darcy is being rude - which leaves only two daughters unaccounted for! )
but being a cheerful hobbit he had not needed hope, as long as despair could be postponed.
Thanks Hobby, but I'm making a point of reading this as I would any other book. What sticks, sticks and what doesn't I expect to become apparent as I progress. It's part of the experience of reading for me. If I was to go back and check, that would be like studying, and I'm reading this book from an entertainment perspective, not an academic perspective.
Cheers,
Alatar
Cheers,
Alatar
That's how I like to read too, Alatar, and Jane Austen certainly wrote this book with the intention of entertaining the general reader.Alatar wrote:Thanks Hobby, but I'm making a point of reading this as I would any other book. What sticks, sticks and what doesn't I expect to become apparent as I progress. It's part of the experience of reading for me. If I was to go back and check, that would be like studying, and I'm reading this book from an entertainment perspective, not an academic perspective.
To answer your question - I think that's okay now - Elizabeth was second of the five daughters. She's 20 years old. She is considered quite attractive but not as pretty as her older sister Jane.
I really enjoyed your post, btw.
- Impenitent
- Throw me a rope.
- Posts: 7260
- Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2005 12:13 am
- Location: Deep in Oz
- truehobbit
- Cute, cuddly and dangerous to know
- Posts: 6019
- Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 2:52 am
- Contact:
Oh, that's how I read too.
But I think that also means, if you miss info, you miss it - we shouldn't tell you!
Because part of the experience then will be that you'll find out whether things once missed will still fall into place.
And we have no way of knowing how old she is by this time, I think.
But I think that also means, if you miss info, you miss it - we shouldn't tell you!
Because part of the experience then will be that you'll find out whether things once missed will still fall into place.
And we have no way of knowing how old she is by this time, I think.
but being a cheerful hobbit he had not needed hope, as long as despair could be postponed.
- Sassafras
- still raining, still dreaming
- Posts: 1406
- Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 4:55 am
- Location: On the far side of nowhere
- Contact:
I'm reading ...
It's wonderful to read Alatar and Cerin's astute observations.
Gave me a whole new perspective, too. Because you have to remember than I haven't read any Austen since college days. I'm enjoying this.
It's wonderful to read Alatar and Cerin's astute observations.
Gave me a whole new perspective, too. Because you have to remember than I haven't read any Austen since college days. I'm enjoying this.
Ever mindful of the maxim that brevity is the soul of wit, axordil sums up the Sil:
"Too many Fingolfins, not enough Sams."
Yes.
Will this be a problem for you, Hobby? I ask because I'm rather a compulsive question answerer. But I daresay I can control myself if it means a lot to you.truehobbit wrote:But I think that also means, if you miss info, you miss it - we shouldn't tell you!
This is strictly true, but I don't think it was exactly a "spoiler". It is possible to deduce from context that she must be about that age.truehobbit wrote:And we have no way of knowing how old she is by this time, I think.
Edited to add: yes, Impish, are you upset? Is it something I did?
- Impenitent
- Throw me a rope.
- Posts: 7260
- Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2005 12:13 am
- Location: Deep in Oz
- truehobbit
- Cute, cuddly and dangerous to know
- Posts: 6019
- Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 2:52 am
- Contact:
Ethel, thanks - no, it's not a problem for me - but I tried to answer Alatar's question and he didn't want the answer!Ethel wrote:Will this be a problem for you, Hobby? I ask because I'm rather a compulsive question answerer. But I daresay I can control myself if it means a lot to you.truehobbit wrote:But I think that also means, if you miss info, you miss it - we shouldn't tell you!
He said he wanted to experience what it's like to read it like any other book, and to find out if what he misses at first falls into place later.
So, to me that means, we must leave his oversights unanswered.
(I guess I'm similar in itching to answer questions - my answer was really the same as yours, I just didn't want to give it explicitly, because we weren't yet discussing, so I thought I'd just give him a hint of how to find the answers himself.)
but being a cheerful hobbit he had not needed hope, as long as despair could be postponed.
Thanks for clearing that up, Imp.
My impression from Alatar was not that he didn't want people to provide answers to things he was unsure of, but that he wasn't about to go re-reading chapters to find out the answers himself. Maybe he'll clarify for us.
For my part, I don't mind people answering whatever questions come up, whether or not we will have found it out for ourselves. I just want everyone to enjoy the discussion.
Do you suppose I should PM Padme and ask her if she wants us to wait for her to catch up?
My impression from Alatar was not that he didn't want people to provide answers to things he was unsure of, but that he wasn't about to go re-reading chapters to find out the answers himself. Maybe he'll clarify for us.
For my part, I don't mind people answering whatever questions come up, whether or not we will have found it out for ourselves. I just want everyone to enjoy the discussion.
Do you suppose I should PM Padme and ask her if she wants us to wait for her to catch up?
I think that's a good idea, Cerin. In my experience, people sometimes start out on a project like this but then get derailed. (I did quite a few group reads at TORC and there were always a lot of 'dropouts'. It's no disgrace! People just get busy.) But if she's preparing a post, I want to wait for it.Cerin wrote:Do you suppose I should PM Padme and ask her if she wants us to wait for her to catch up?